User talk:Fromahill

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woodyard.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sarah (talk) 22:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fromahill, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you'd like to drop by the Teahouse and discuss the article, the experienced hosts at the Teahouse would be glad to see if they can offer improvement suggestions... and that may lead to the article becoming accepted. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 22:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woodyard concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woodyard, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Woodyard

Hello Fromahill. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Woodyard.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woodyard}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fromahill/Mary Tooke

A tag has been placed on User:Fromahill/Mary Tooke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change spellings so they don’t match the source as you did at New Albion (colony)

There are a lot of words in that article that don’t use current spelling. I don’t know why you picked that one and a quick copy and paste showed the spelling in the article was correct. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 21:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the will and Ireland is not being spelled ‘Oreland’ Fromahill (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/D803416 Fromahill (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read that well enough to confirm it. But this [1] uses the spelling you changed. By the way I wrote an article about one aspect of this.[2] Doug Weller talk 07:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]