User talk:FromNewsToEncyclopedia

Hello, FromNewsToEncyclopedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! User:Queen-washington (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Carla Ortiz, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Giant Snowman 07:36, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False. All what was written was sourced. If you doubt some sources may be partial because journalists are Syrians, this is maybe a point we should discuss, wether it is only factual or it may contain oinion. But Der Spiegel article is merely factual and is a perfectly reliable source. So yes, I think you made a mistake and wrote that on Carla Ortiz discussion page. Thanks. FromNewsToEncyclopedia (talk) 12:05, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Speedy deletion nomination of Eva Bartlett

A tag has been placed on Eva Bartlett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article is bordering on WP:ATTACK The tone is biased and partisan and the article consists solely of contentious opinion pieces, some of which are dubiously and/or inadequately sourced. The article is neither biographical or encyclopedic. Even the website of the article subject links to a opinion piece, as opposed to the website itself. There are no suitable reverts. The entire article needs rewriting to conform to BLP standards

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RebeccaSaid (talk) 09:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eva Bartlett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eva Bartlett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Bartlett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huldra (talk) 20:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]