User talk:From14

Welcome!

Hello, From14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ishq Murshid did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a Templates for discussion notice or a comment from a TfD discussion, as you did at Hum Network. CNMall41 (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Ok

I think that the Discussion was Closed. From14 (talk) 11:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was no discussion. It was you and the sock farm removing templates without addressing the issues. Welcome back. --CNMall41 (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 11:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Burns Road Kay Romeo Juliet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Obvious DUCK of sock Nauman335 . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Khaie moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khaie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 The Page Ready to move and are fully referenced and There is no reason for To move the main Space to Draft. From14 (talk) 11:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like it matters since you have never listen the first 50 times, but you first need to address your COI by declaring under WP:PAID and stop creating SOCK accounts. Until then, nothing to discuss. --CNMall41 (talk) 11:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 First i want to be clear that I'm not a Sock and The Drafts were Ready to the main Space. From14 (talk) 11:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violating copyright

I just blanked a section of one of your drafts because it was copy-pasted from an external site. I'm currently reviewing your other contributions for similar copyright violations. Do not copy text from other sites onto Wikipedia. Chiselinccc (talk) 18:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think no one can see you removing the undisclosed paid tags from your own articles? This is a great way to get blocked. I won't be the one doing it, but I will do everything I can to work against copyright violation (as flagged above) and conflicts of interest (as indicated by your behavior in the brief time I've observed your editing). Chiselinccc (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc This Article was not a paid contribution so i removed it From14 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to remove tags from your own articles, that were placed there because of your behavior. Stop trying to work around Wikipedia and try working WITH it. If you continue to ignore everyone's concerns and push through content that is inappropriate, you will not be able to contribute content much longer.

Any defense regarding the first message in this thread, where you copy-pasted a paragraph from another website into one of your drafts? That is a MUCH more serious violation of policy. Chiselinccc (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41, I see from this user's talk page history that there is more going on than is apparent from the surface. I came across their rapid-fire edits which indeed appear promotional in nature, and discovered one major copyright violation so far. Tagging you to let you know this is still going on, I'm pretty new so the the best I know to do is revert their more egregious violations in mainspace. Chiselinccc (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc:, it is a UPE sock farm that works film-related pages. They are persistent and need to be added to the LTA category. Typical behavior of the same socks involved with the whining and crying. Watch the begging after they are blocked. It is sad because they are taking advantage of a delay with CU at SPI at the moment. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing maintenance tags

Do you think the editors who value this site are going to just give up, and let you do whatever you want?

Stop removing AfD notices and maintenance tags. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc Ok I understand but why are you adding the Conflicting templates in every article where i made edits. From14 (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not answering a single question of yours until you answer my first question which you have ignored:

WHY did you copy an entire description to one of your draft articles?

Do you understand how many policies and guidelines you have violated just today? This is not cool, and you're not going to get away with this atrocious behavior. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc Which description i have copied ? why you have not mentioned that Page ?

And Sorry for my disruptive edits because I'm just Cleaning 🧹 the Articles as because they were not Paid or Copied or Unreferenced. From14 (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to remove tags that are warning people about problems with your content, period.

The description was in the FIRST MESSAGE I LEFT ON YOUR PAGE HERE. You completely copied the synopsis of a television show from a commercial page, I removed the text and am now searching to make sure you did not do this with any of your other spammy drafts. Copyright violations are a serious problem.

If you are not being paid, what is motivating you to promote all of this content at such a rapid pace, and with such disregard for rules and details? Chiselinccc (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc As I stated that I'm just interested in contributing to Pakistan Media related articles.

If i was a paid user, why did I edit every single article ? From14 (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to "clean your articles" then improve the terribly unencyclopedic writing, do not remove the maintenance tags that are currently the only thing fit for an encyclopedia on any of these "articles."

Frankly, I do not believe your claim of cleaning up articles, because if you actually cared about that you would keep them in draft form until they are appropriate for publication. Instead you are moving unfinished drafts into mainspace, and trying to reverse other editors' attempts to clean up YOUR inappropriate publications. Stop it. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc Ok I'm Understand

Thank you For your humble advice From14 (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up the mess you have made. Move articles back to draft form, practice in your sandbox, and maybe you won't get blocked when administrators get a chance to review what you've been doing. I have no sympathy for this sort of reckless, disruptive editing. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zulm_%28TV_series%29&diff=1208968229&oldid=1208953342&variant=en

Here is the link to the edit where I wiped out your extreme copyright violation. The best use of your time would be to review your other content additions and ensure you did not commit violations like this in other places. You are not allowed to copy text from other sites to Wikipedia verbatim, nor to paraphrase too closely. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiselinccc Thank you For Your Advice. I will take care next time. From14 (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How fond you seem to be of giving polite answers which mean absolutely nothing!

I will be reviewing all of your contributions moving forward. Wikipedia is not your advertising billboard. Chiselinccc (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Khaie (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khaie (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nauman335 - SOCKS from UPE farm continue to bludgeon the page. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:List of programs broadcast by Green Entertainment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:List of programs broadcast by Green Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Zulm (TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Zulm (TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zulm (TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zulm (TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Zulm (TV series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Zulm (TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 01:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

From14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked as the reason for Abused edits. I have done any action in which I'm blocked. I request you to Unblock me. I spend all day and all night trying to contribute to Wikipedia to make everyone search here and find all their stuff accurately. I Request again to Unblock me.

Decline reason:

You are blocked based on technical evidence, and your denial does not outweigh this. PhilKnight (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From14 (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Hello Josh - you blocked this for WP:BE, but you didn't specify who the master is. I am working on a SPI and need clarification regarding this account. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Nauman335. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

From14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's more than 5 months since my account was Blocked. Now I'm here to request Unblock my account. I will not repeat my previous mistakes and I also want to clarify that I'm not a Sock User, Please believe me. Thank you

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is established and is not in doubt. We won't be lifting this block. Yamla (talk) 17:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

From14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamla I think it can be a mistake. I'm using my Mobile Data Internet and its IP address can be the same as the other blocked Sockpuppet. By God I'm not a Sock user and this is only my Single account. I have the same interest as the Blocked Sockpuppet was. There are a lot of articles that i have edited but the Sock has not.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock, still creating new accounts. Revoking talk page access.Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.