User talk:Friendlystar

Hello

I just wanted to stop by and say I saw you hard at work adding interlanguage links to ru.wikipedia, and tell you that we appreciate your hard work. Thanks for taking the time to do it, and if I can be of any help to you with anything, please let me know. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 06:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template edits

While I appreciate what you are attempting to do with the galaxy and galaxy cluster templates, your recent changes to those templates does not seem to work well if references are used in the templates (as is commonly done in the galaxy articles). Could you please fix the problem for all templates? If you do not fix the problem by 26 Nov, I will revert your changes to the templates (although I would prefer to see the template work with your revisions). Thank you, Dr. Submillimeter 10:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have ra_info and dec_info parameters already implemented in templates for such purpose. I'll go though all articles to fix the problem. Thanks. friendlystar 10:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I gave this some thought, and I am going to revert your changes to the galaxy and galaxy cluster templates for now. The previous system was working fine; including the references in the same template line as the data itself makes more sense than splitting the information in the templates. Moreover, no other quantities in the infoboxes are treated this way. However, I am willing to discuss this further at Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects. It would have been appropriate for you to discuss your template changes there first before Dr. Submillimeter 11:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comments on the WikiProject Astronomical objects page. Your changes now make more sense, although I still do not think that they should be implemented. Also, you should not have created Template:Galaxy demo. You should have created the template as a user page. You should ensure that the template is deleted when the template discussion is over. Finally, you should not have deleted the warning messages on your talk pages about uploaded material. The administrators will often scold people for taking such actions, and it may be grounds for having your account blocked. Dr. Submillimeter 14:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dr. Submillimeter. Thank you for your replay, I didn't know that I can create operational template under user, will keep it in mind. I'll ensure that template deleted when discussion is over. I wanted to clean up this page for discussions and removed some non-critical (IMHO), but space consuming stuff, next time I'll be more careful, thanks for the advise. friendlystar 15:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I am not certain that templates themselves can be created in userspace, but you can create tables that look like templates. That would have been sufficient for the discussion. Thank you for being patient with this discussion, and thank you for being willing to discuss template changes with other users. Dr. Submillimeter 15:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates nominated for deletion

Hello. I have put some templates that you created up for deletion; please read the nomination in the "Astronomical coordinate templates" section of Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 January 7, and leave your comments. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisky links.

Please remove your wikisky links. Wikisky is not a good enough external link, and even if it was, the bolding is out of place. -- Jeandré, 2007-01-09t19:39z

Which pages you mean? friendlystar 05:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wherever you've placed the links, see Special:Contributions/Friendlystar. -- Jeandré, 2007-01-10t18:26z

I have to agree, I think that this overexposes wikisky.org and, inadvertently, promotes the site (also, by this extension, the bolding is problematic, and I'm seeing a few users who followed suit, bolding nasa links, and so on, which makes those pages look odd). The point, though, is that a reader can search any astronomical body in the map, so I'm not sure we need the ready-made links added to tens upon tens of these respective entries. Thus, I removed them. Sorry, it probably took you a while to sort & add them. Thank you. Best regards, El_C 03:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toolserveraccount

Hello Friendlystar,
please send your real-name, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB.

Star images

Great job on adding all those images. Forget everything I said about Wikisky (above). With these many images, you can do whatever you like! El_C 08:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It took us almost a year to process DSS2 all sky survey that I'm using now to cut images for Wikipedia friendlystar (talk)

Image:M45 DSS2 WikiSky.jpg

Could you please link to where this image has been released under the license it has been tagged with? J Milburn (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link to copyright notice and source of the image. Could you please clarify your concerns. Thanks. friendlystar (talk)

The link goes to a rather odd page that does not even mention Creative Commons. Furthermore, I am concerned that these images aren't even free- they seem to be authorised for Wikipedia use only. J Milburn (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All this copyright stuff rather confuses me. Original DSS2 data (photographic plates) is copyrighted. See [1]. Then NASA's Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) digitized those photographic plates into FITS, but original copyright is preserved in digital data. At the same time the image

, that is actually produced out of DSS2 data, set on Wikipedia as public domain without copyright. Anyway WIKISKY team specifically asked for permission to use DSS2 data for Wikipedia articles illustrations. If you think the copyright notice I'm using is incorrect for the case I described above, please let me know how it suppose to be. Thanks. friendlystar (talk)

Permission for Wikipedia use only is not enough, I am afraid. Any content we host must be available for anyone to use, commercially or non-commercially, modified or unmodified, for any purpose. This means we can only accept public domain or freely licensed media. From what you have said to me, these images, sadly, do not appear to be either, and so should be deleted. Is this assessment accurate? J Milburn (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have to clarify the licensing. It is possible the images are fit into Public domain like the Pleiades image I mentioned above

. I checked the source page of that image and it doesn't state any copyright on that image. friendlystar (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images are copyrighted by default, so no copyright notice means that they are unusable. I recommend you don't upload any more images from this source until we have this issue resolved. J Milburn (talk) 16:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble site states "Unless otherwise specifically stated, no claim to copyright is being asserted by STScI and it may be freely used as in the public domain in accordance with NASA's contract". The image above came from the Hubble site and the page does not specify additional copyright on it, though the image is based on copyrighted DSS2 data. That's what confuses me. friendlystar (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Data cannot be copyrighted, only the way that it is presented. That would mean, according to their own copyright page, that any images created by STScI that they do not claim specific copyright on can be considered public domain- could you please ensure that images you have uploaded link to the original location of the image, the copyright page you linked to above and are tagged as PD-NASA? The issue now appears to be not that the images are non-free, but that the sourcing and copyright information is not fully accurate on our image pages. J Milburn (talk) 09:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Image:NGC 1533.jpg I created out of Hubble data [2]. It links there from image page. I'd happy to release all wikisky produced images to public domain if it doesn't conflict with any other licenses. Please advise on proper license tags. Thanks. friendlystar (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another example of an image produced out of DSS2 data that is in public domain - File:The Witch Head nebula - IC 2118.jpg. So I'd be happy to correct license/source linking page to clear out the issue. Probably would be better to create some template for wikisky images annotations friendlystar (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi! I'm from it.wiki, and I'm conducing your same battle :-). May be a possibility to use that images from wikisky, I'm searching about that. I sent a request to have an OTRS, they reply to send an email to copyright@stsci.edu. If you want to learn more about my battle or if you have more informations, please don't hesitate to contact me here. Bye! :-) You write freely in english. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 13:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contact. Please keep me updated if there any progress. I'll do so as well friendlystar (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! (so you write your answer here? Ok...) I sent to the last email address a request, explaining very very well what we need/want to use, they said "Thank you for your interest in the Hubble Space Telescope." Strange, isn't it? Anyway, they are processing my request, I'll keep you update, of course. Bye! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 10:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andromeda I copyright?

On Image talk:Andromeda I.jpg I claimed that the image is copyrighted STScI who maintain a non-commercial policy which stands in conflict with Wikipedia's OpenDocument share-share-alike policy. Here is a page providing a link to the DSS copyright here. The material used on SKY-MAP.ORG therefore shouldn't be used under Wikipedia's own policies, and we cannot produce images from that material and claim the copyright ourselves. That I believe. Said: Rursus (☻) 20:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the images produced from SKY-MAP.ORG are non-free, but can be used according to Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, because there are no other free similar images on Internet and the images are really important. So SKY-MAP.ORG might actually be in error regarding Wikipedia's policies. But the copyright belongs to the photography provider, which is covered by the DSS copyright, and derivative works cannot be claimed by other persons, since the copyright is non-free. Said: Rursus (☻) 06:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, use of WikiSky's DSS images in Wikipedia is currently an open legal question. Some DSS images from other sources (i.e. NASA site) are claimed as public domain here that only adds more confusion. I'm trying not to cut more DSS images from WikiSky until the issue resolved. But WikiSky hosts many NASA's own images (i.e. Hubble, Spitzer telescopes) that no doubts are in public domain friendlystar (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think one of the confusions might be about the role of SKY-MAP.ORG and its web-software, but I believe the main copyright issue is clear: we want to produce a lot of derived images where the image originators claim a copyright (or in NASA's case expressively don't claim it), so the trouble will mostly be identifying the image sources. If SKY-MAP.ORG would only use NASA images, then everything would be perfect: the derived images are free for anyone, including claiming copyright. As long as ESA or other actors are involved, there might be a copyright issue. (BTW, the Andromeda I might serve well from a retouch by increasing the contrast at the faintest level – this is why I stumbled over the question in the first hand, I can do it myself – but as you say: we'll await a solution to this copyright issue). Said: Rursus (☻) 09:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SKY-MAP.ORG has source url for almost every image. The links available on image's pages, i.e. [3], Though it would be nice to have those links along with copyright information right on image snapshot page. DSS color images processed by SKY-MAP out of blue and red survey data. Here's some info: [4] friendlystar (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi! About WikiSky's permission, I think that they will inform me/us as soon as possible. Waiting for that, I can tell you a good news: this italian site has released an OTRS permission (here) to use all its images without any distinction. You must prepare before a template like this (translate, it's easy), after that you can upload images from that site. They have a lot of very nice images of clusters/nebulae/galaxies and more! I hope you'll enjoy this news. Bye! :-) --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 12:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:16 Cygni AB DSS2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:16 Cygni AB DSS2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Icalanise (talk) 11:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xi Scorpii.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Xi Scorpii.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[5][6]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Mike Peel (talk) 19:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:M45 DSS2 WikiSky.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:M45 DSS2 WikiSky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 01:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'mon, not another DSS-deletion spree... Should we start with File:Pleiades large.jpg again? That image even shows wrong license. friendlystar (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:IC 1296.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IC 1296.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 20:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WikiSky web site.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WikiSky web site.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, the source website [7] does not have a license that is compatible with that of Wikipedia's.

Please note that "wikisky" web files are licensed for non-commercial use only [8], which is incompatible with the Wikipedia's retention/deletion policy. They do state, however, that an WP:OTRS ticket may be possibly obtained through pr@sky-map.info. Without the OTRS ticket, this image will be deleted 1 week after this notice. Skier Dude (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, it's another Wikisky deletion spree - there are about 115 images from there that do not have the correct OTRS permission or licensing tags here. Rather than load you page with deletion notices, you can see the list at Category:Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status as of 21 December 2009. I've noted in a quick review (not all of them yet) that no OTRS was requested or received for these. Skier Dude (talk) 03:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NGC 4435 NGC 4438 dss2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NGC 4435 NGC 4438 dss2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:26, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NGC 4435 NGC 4438 dss2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NGC 4435 NGC 4438 dss2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EqCoor

Template:EqCoor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Open cluster images

A tag has been placed on Category:Open cluster images indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]