User talk:FriendRahul

Indic scripts

Please do not introduce WP:INDIC SCRIPTS in articles like you did at Tirupati.--Vin09 (talk) 11:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Telugu_language, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, FriendRahul. You have new messages at Vin09's talk page.
Message added 12:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Vin09 (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 06:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hosur. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 17:28, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please refrain from adding stuff based on factually inaccurate sources. Go, check the official sources. —Vensatry _(ping) 17:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry and Spaceman So you mean even though the content you are reverting has no reference to cite and also false I should not edit?? Bcz you both being tamilians?? I wont edit, but I wont leave this matter. I will proceed in my way such that you will lose all your rights for misusing Wikipedia. Use your common sense before reverting. I will drag you soon legally and you will be rewardes for sarcasm. Hosur is our town and we know what is the exact figure and even souces I cited prove the same. Adding or reverting cite less content is the blunder mistake you done. Will see you soon.

Your recent edits to User talk:FriendRahul could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Mww113 (talk) 02:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Opened at WP:AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mww113 (talk) 02:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Swarm ♠ 03:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FriendRahul, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Vensatry _(ping) 17:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]