User talk:FriendOfGodChen
September 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm DanCherek. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Riyadh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- This was a VERY inappropriate removal. VERY INNAPROPRITATE. INdeed it was a mistake. You deleted content with out even examining the SOURCES of the material that was added. All were independent verifiable sources of info that are trustworthy and up to Wikipedia Standards. IT was OBJECTIVE. There is indeed a lot of homosexual activity in so its OBJECTIVE to include this info NOT subjective because it is in fact a notable feature of this city. Also other wikipedia pages have precedent of having sections about LGBTQ. FOr example the wikipedia page on SAN FRANCISCO has an entire section on LGBTQ. Thus it is relevant to the article. FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- I encourage you to look at the sources of the information which are reliable source of information like established newspapers. FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Riyadh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DanCherek (talk) 23:15, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- You engage in war on truth not me.
- I write truth. You engage edit war on it.
- I write truth. You engage in an edit war in the name falsehood.
- You start the talk page. I'll respond after you start. It's your burden since you are the one who fails to bring valid truth when I ALREADY PROVIDED VALID OBJECTIVE SOURCES. It is NONNEUTRAL. Why the fuck does san francisco have a page? cause objective sources support that san francisco has LGBTQ. is it controversial. NO. So this was published in the ATlantic and even saudi office said this paid for in saudi arabia you can see.
- YOu are doing an edit war on truth. FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:DanCherek. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- watch this:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ8PSKSWeEw&t=168s&ab_channel=VideoFlix
- Dan is at war on truth. FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Riyadh, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 23:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Watch this:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ8PSKSWeEw&t=168s&ab_channel=VideoFlix FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Why are you calling truth disruptive editing? Are you at edit war with the San francisco page on LGBTQ? no you aren't you deleting that truth. You should be on the side of CONTSTURCTIVE EDITS like the one i made. INstead you are lying about well-sourced information FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)- It was a useful edit. FriendOfGodChen (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.