User talk:Freudianr

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means, and on Notability (people) for more detail. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources, and must be written from a neutral point of view and not in a promotional tone. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
You should not write articles about yourself, your band, your company, your client or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have turned your article Vijay Eswaran into a redirect to Dato Vijay Eswaran - we do not need two identical articles. I have also added a tag indicating concern about the tone of the article, which reads like a public-relations piece or advertisement: please read WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPOV, as well as the links in the Welcome paragraph above. JohnCD (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Vijay Eswaran

your claim is valid as far as QI group is concerned , As far as CB CID of india is concered Vijay Eswaran is still prime the accused QI's Press release does not make him innocent so reverting your edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.srinivaas (talk • contribs) 07:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no legal document publicly available that states that Vijay Eswaran is the prime accused in this case. There have been many allegations and responses, but no conviction or legal proof that makes him guilty. That is not for anyone to speculate and certainly not on Wikipedia. Please refer to the section on Controversies where I have added the reference to the accusation and provided the same link that you have, while also adding the QI Group's statement. Freudianr (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your contributions to wikipedia is only on the article about Vijay Eswaran ,are you contributing just to promote a person ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.srinivaas (talk • contribs) 09:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Freudianr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Vijay Eswaran, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

QNet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 19:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello and welcome! It may not have been your intention, but you recently removed the entire contents of an article. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored. If there is a problem with the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page. If you think the article should be removed entirely, see the instructions for requesting deletion. Thank you! — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 13:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qnet ltd

I've declined your request for speedy deletion of Qnet ltd. I see no evidence that the page was written in bad faith, as you assert. I agree that the page is not totally neutral; however, editing the page to balance it is the best option.

I also don't see the alleged neutral page about the company that you refer to. If you mean QNet, that article was deleted three times: once because it infringed the copyrights of the subject company, and twice because the text was blatantly promotional. So that page doesn't appear to have ever been neutral by any measure. —C.Fred (talk) 15:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I've opened discussion about the article at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Qnet ltd. —C.Fred (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Freudianr. You have new messages at Guerillero's talk page.
Message added 19:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Guerillero | My Talk 19:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qnet

Hello, Freudianr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Qnet, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]