User talk:Fredrockjtv

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Fredrockjtv. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jewelry Television, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jewelry television logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Jewelry television logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 21:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing...

·The Weather Channel example was to show that less twenty million homes, a claim of being on every cable system is incorrect. That is impossible because some systems carry only up to twenty channels, and there are many more that just don't carry the channel either due to refusal or carriage conflicts. Unless you're TWC or C-SPAN, that's just not happening. And The Weather Channel pays for every single subscriber (yes, I do know this network pays to be on pay-TV systems); just ask their carriage department and DirecTV subscribers what happened earlier this year. Also, the term is not 'coverage area'; that is for a broadcast television station. 'Audience reach' is much more appropriate.

·We are not denying viewers of the network any access to information at all, we are here to provide a neutral description of the channel and what it does. We are not here to be another social media arm repeating the network's press release talking points. The network has a website with a channel guide which can easily be found via Google, and we don't repeat information which is easily found there.

·Finally, I crossed checked the websites and programming listings of the affiliates listed and removed those which no longer show any network programming scheduled within their listings; I'm removing information that simply doesn't apply any longer, along with references which do not lead to the information claimed in the article, along with guide information which is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. There is hardly any harm being done, while promotional editing hurts the encyclopedia as a whole. Again, if you have a conflict of interest, you must cease editing this article or work with the existing consensus on what is appropriate or not. Nate • (chatter) 01:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

first of all what is your definition of cable system? charter, comcast, time warner cable....then yes, Jtv is on ALL cable systems. are they on every local comcast station throughout the US, no. because you have to go to each local cable station to conduct a deal with them. so yes, Jtv is on all Cable systems. are they on all the comcast cable subscriber's homes, no. because they are not on all comcast cable stations throughout the US.

and concerning the weather channel, which all you did was just look at their information on their wiki page, and then apply your logic to every station including Jtv and concluded that the information stated on Jtv's wiki page was wrong. and the disruption that you are talking about with directv and the weather channel, was about how much directv was willing to pay for the weather channel's content. and since you have all the answers concerning the area of cable, satellite and home shopping channels, please check out this website for the actual correct information about what happened concerning directv & the weather channel.... "DirecTV dropped TWC on January 14. The channel wanted a penny increase in the price DirecTV pays for it. (It averages 13 cents per subscriber per month across pay TV systems, according to SNL Kagan data.)" http://deadline.com/2014/04/the-weather-channel-returns-directv-deal-711602/ don't think for one minute that the weather channels pays directv to have their content broadcasted on their satellite. if you really think that, then ESPN pays directv to have their signal broadcast on their satellite also, which is absurd. i personal don't appreciation how you are able to inflict you narrow way of thinking onto a company that has done nothing wrong to you in anyway, but you feel that it's your moral duty to clean up this company's wikipedia site and basically call the writer of this information a lier. and yet, you are the one with the wrong information and yet, you still find it necessary to degrade me and any feeble attempt that i make to help the readers of wikipedia better understand this company.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Jewelry Television. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 01:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jewelry television logo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jewelry television logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]