User talk:FredrickEllifsen

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prajyotmahajan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

bonadea contributions talk 20:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what I wrote here →

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. Follow the instructions here. As the "manager" of the subject, you should not be creating this article yourself, because its obvious you can't - it reads like a fansite or a press release. Wikipedia is not a directory or a webhost, and subjects must meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. "We people" are not here to cater to your demands either. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

If you are the same person as user Prajyotmahajan (talk · contribs), please choose one account and use only that one. If you are not Prajyot Mahajan, you should not use an account in his name. Use of two accounts to reinforce each other is considered sockpuppetry and will lead to blocks. Also, each account must be used by only one person: shared accounts are not permitted.

Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Wikipedia is not here to help advertise or promote anything or anyone, and articles require a WP:Neutral point of view.

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction. JohnCD (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have deleted your draft as a blatant hoax, because it was largely copied from Sungha Jung, so that claims like:

"his playing caught the attention of world-renowned guitarists, who found his covers of their songs impressive. Prajyot has since played on stage with them multiple times. Prajyot has received guitar lessons from Hata Shuji, a well-known Japanese jazz guitarist. He has also been mentored by German guitarist Ulli Bögershausen, who Prajyot refers to as his musical inspiration and from whom he learned much about composing and arranging."

are simply not true.

In fact, searches like Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL find a lot of social media but no confirmation in reliable independent sources that Mahajan has any of the achievements you claim. Searching Youtube finds this, with no sign of the claimed 2.8 million views.

I have blocked your account because I conclude that you are not here to help build an encyclopedia, but only to waste our time by making false claims in order to promote someone who does not meet Wikipedia's WP:MUSICBIO standard for inclusion. JohnCD (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making false claims to promote a client - see above. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]