User talk:Frederickexley
Welcome!
[edit]
|
May 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Advocates for Informed Choice has been reverted.
Your edit here to Advocates for Informed Choice was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/theinterfaceproject) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia :) Can you possibly slow down on your editing of the above article? Things such as references, etc, are going missing and some of the links are being broken. I'll go in and fix them again, but it's kinda getting a little messy. Let's work together and make the article really nice :) - Alison ❤ 19:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi there. Can you hold off a little and maybe talk to me here? Things are getting a little jumbled up :/ - Alison ❤ 19:51, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I certainly can. Sorry! :-) Frederickexley (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Let me know if I can give you any information! Frederickexley (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that! :) Ok - I've re-added the references and formatted them nicely. The article is looking great, and I'm really glad you added information about the ongoing lawsuit. Personally, I hope it's successful but because of policy here, I have to keep my opinion to myself. Maybe, I think, should we remove some of the references to Anne's qualifications and history details as the article isn't strictly about her, but AIC, and just capture the essentials? What do you think? - Alison ❤ 20:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, and I added back in the reference to Accord Alliance, as they're the next biggest visible IS-related org in the US right now. I think it's only fair. It may be fair to add a reference to AIC in their article, too - Alison ❤ 20:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your encouragement (your personal opinion only of course!). I was toying with the idea of just giving Anne her own page as she's had long decorated career already. [removed a bit] Ok, I'll wait to make any more changes until you let me know all the formatting dust has settled! Many thanks! Frederickexley (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oops - I caught that comment there and I have deleted a few revisions of your page as it wasn't for public consumption. Lucky I'm an admin here :) Anyways - point understood about that, and I'm kinda aware of that aspect of things, too. Best off removing it, like you have! Email me here if you wish to say something non-public! Okies - I'll just tidy up bits and pieces of your links, but everything looks fine. Maybe Anne would eventually like an article of her own (see WP:BLP on that) but it can be a bit of a mixed blessing having one! Thanks again and good luck with editing - you're doing great! - Alison ❤ 21:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Alison! Frederickexley (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Frederickexley, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Frederickexley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Porter Gale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XXXY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey. I added (film) to XXXY and that takes you to the exact and correct page. Let me know if it's ok! --69.146.29.99 (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Tamar-Mattis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Minors and Sterilization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Micro Rainbow International
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Micro Rainbow International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 01:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- It looks like it was half-finished and could be made into a useful article. I've moved it to Draft:Micro Rainbow International for now. - Alison ❤ 03:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Tamar-Mattis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Attorney and Founder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Sebastian Rocca.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Sebastian Rocca.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:XXXY, Kristi's bike.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:XXXY, Kristi's bike.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Advocates for Informed Choice
- added a link pointing to JD
- Anne Tamar-Mattis
- added a link pointing to BA
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Micro Rainbow International
[edit]Hello, Frederickexley. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Micro Rainbow International".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 03:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Frederickexley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)