User talk:AcidicGarage

October 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Show Must Go On (Queen song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Life During Wartime (song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Rob van vee 16:57, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Helter Skelter (song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Helter Skelter (song) was changed by Fred21moore (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-11-20T17:18:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Atom Heart Mother (suite), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 07:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. Flooded with them hundreds 16:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Shine On Brightly. Rob van vee 17:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Live in Hyde Park, London, 1969.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Live in Hyde Park, London, 1969.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:46, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Loosen Up Naturally moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Loosen Up Naturally, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Paul Tisdale. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Simon & Garfunkel. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Loosen Up Naturally

Hello, Fred21moore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Loosen Up Naturally".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]