User talk:Frankygavron

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin Gregg (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In order to meet the inclusion criteria, extensive coverage via independent, reliable sources is required. The refs used here don't establish Melvin Gregg's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melvin Gregg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Melvin Gregg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frankygavron! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 21:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Melvin Gregg

Hello, Frankygavron. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melvin Gregg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I restored the article and couldn't help but want to work on the draft when I saw that he was a native Virginian. I have a bit of a soft spot for local people who hit it big. In any case, there seems to be plenty of sourcing, so I'm going to move this live myself as long as you don't mind - you can continue to work on it live. He looks to be clearly notable given the amount and type of sourcing. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin Gregg has been accepted

Melvin Gregg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin Gregg (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR, requires significant roles in multiple notable productions, not minor roles or bit parts

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melvin Gregg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Melvin Gregg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan arndt: It looks like we overlapped. I approved the article due to the amount of sourcing announcing roles, discussing the actor, and reviews of projects that mention him. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved live

Hey, just moved it live and added a bunch of sources. I can understand where people reviewing won't add sourcing since there are so many articles to review but I'm still a bit disappointed. Gregg is very clearly notable. In any case, I wanted to let you know that you should nominate this for Did You Know (WP:DYK) since it's a new article and you created it. This brochure goes over the process - it's aimed at students, but would still be a decent resource for explaining the process. Let me know on my talk page if you need any help and thanks for creating the article! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juliana Canfield moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Juliana Canfield, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Juliana Canfield

Hello, Frankygavron. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juliana Canfield, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juliana Canfield

Hello, Frankygavron. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Juliana Canfield".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]