User talk:Frankie1964
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Frankie1964, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shyamal Bagchee, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Onel5969 TT me 21:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Shyamal Bagchee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Academic who meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Appears a bit promotional as well.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 21:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion vague
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Lots of university professors have Wikipedia pages. I used templates from the same university. How is this one any different? Further, you state is a "a bit promotional." I cannot make changes without clarification or potentially an example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankie1964 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- If you disagree with deleting the page, all you have to do is remove the template and give a reason. Anyone can do this, including you, and it's against the rules to replace it.
- What would happen next? It's quite possible that the same editor or some other editor will nominate the page for deletion through a discussion. WP:AFD
- The sourcing on Shyamal Bagchee is, to put it bluntly, slim. There are large swaths of material with no footnotes. It would need significant improvements to pass even at WP:AFC and I doubt if it would survive at AFD in its current condition.
- If you were thinking that some other substandard article on Wikipedia would give you support for adding another inadequately sourced article, you'll likely find that to be wrong. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 22:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Shyamal Bagchee for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyamal Bagchee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.