User talk:Francois Bonnay

This is Francois Bonnay's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Aletaha (english version) (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry editor, you need to show how this person passes the WP:NACADEMIC criteria through the use of multiple independent secondary sources - your sources so far are all WP:PRIMARY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Aletaha (english version) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Francois Bonnay! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qcne!

I'm not sure to understand the rejection. Daniel Aletaha has his own webpage on the german Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Aletaha). I'm only doing a translation in english here.

There are references in the text that he is the president of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (https://www.eular.org/a-message-from-our-president). I don't really understand what else you need ?

Thank you for helping me clarifying this!

Francois Francois Bonnay (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello Francois Bonnay. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Daniel Aletaha (english version), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Francois Bonnay. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Francois Bonnay|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Double-Grazing.

I am a project manager, paid by the Medical University of Vienna, working together with Daniel Aletaha. I have now added this disclosure to my user page. Francois Bonnay (talk) 12:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Aletaha (english version) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Aletaha (english version). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Anything else I need to do? Or just wait for now? Francois Bonnay (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can please support the date of birth with a reliable published source (it may be that one of the sources already cited provides it, I didn't look), then I'm pretty much ready to accept this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the only sources published on Internet I found; those are CVs that were uploaded. One of them was uploaded on EMEUNET (the EULAR website) (https://emeunet.eular.org/sysModules/obxEmeunet/docs/member_2/Aletaha.pdf), which is independent of our University. Is that sufficient ? Francois Bonnay (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Aletaha has been accepted

Daniel Aletaha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josef Smolen has been accepted

Josef Smolen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 16:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guessitsavis,

Thank you so much for your kind words. I'm really glad that you found the submission of high quality!

I wish you a great day,

Francois Francois Bonnay (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]