User talk:Fragum1
February 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Crowborough with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Crowborough. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Crowborough with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Crowborough Beacon
[edit]The edit was made because the information on the page is incorrect in part nor does it give the up to date position of access to the common. The information has not been checked with the golf club. My original edit gave the correct position which any reasonable person would leave intact. The source for the course measurement is from the clubs own measurements. There is no mention of the rescinding of the section 193 agreement. Your post is not informative and gives a wholly incorrect statement of the current position
Fragum1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Fragum1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC) |