User talk:FrMaRePb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faculty of Theology Paderborn (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission contains almost no references and no internal links. See also Help:Your first article and WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faculty of Theology Paderborn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FrMaRePb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernd Irlenborn

The article Bernd Irlenborn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI check for Faculty of Theology Paderborn

Hello. Do you have any association with this organisation or any of its members?

Also, could you please explain why you moved the article to mainspace soon after the independent AFC reviewer declined the draft? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Faculty of Theology Paderborn

Hello, FrMaRePb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faculty of Theology Paderborn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]