Jump to content

User talk:Foyjul90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, CryptoPunks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Crypto blogs are not reliable sources. Lord Belbury (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Foyjul90, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 11:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Manobkantha has been reverted.
Your edit here to The Manobkantha was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/DailyManobkantha/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zaeem Ahmed

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zaeem Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaeem Ahmed (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Foyjul90! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zaeem Ahmed

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zaeem Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaeem Ahmed (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AssumeGoodWraith was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
– AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaeem Ahmed (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zaeem Ahmed has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zaeem Ahmed. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zaeem Ahmed has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zaeem Ahmed. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. But, how can I source the education and early life section? They are just personal information. I edited the line "änd still holding the pride." I meant, he is still holding the position. But I am changing that. Please let me know any further modification.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaeem Ahmed (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage (not mnetions in passing) in multiple independent (his employer's website, Prime Bank, is a primary source, as are press releases from the bank) secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to provide an authentic source from his employer (Prime Bank). I provided their employee list page mentioning his name. Also, they have the news page, but in there I only found the news a drop-down section, which cannot be copied. Though I am adding this.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zaeem Ahmed (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Despite the previous advice of reviewers, the only addition made was a reference for his employer. Constantly submitting a draft without fixing the issues can be considered disruptive. Prior to determining if you still wish to submit, please read WP:FIRST and WP:ANYBIO to help guide you through the process.
CNMall41 (talk) 08:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the wiki policy and the problems. But when a person is prominent but was not featured in some news media as he is not coming outside much, how can source his personal information like family background authenticity or educational authenticity. Recently he is coming to highlight in news and I tried to provide the sources. Now, what else I can do? when a person has a biography in wiki, then we can tell that he is authentic. Before that, he and his mother when started, that time there were not much news media to feature them. I hope you can understand. If he is not an authentic person then why should a bank will feature him. Please consider the situation and approve. Please. Foyjul90 (talk) 08:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Foyjul90[reply]

Wikipedia isn't based on real-life accomplishments. Notability is determined by significant coverage in reliable sources. Based on your statement above, it appears that you have a connection with the subject. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosures as applicable. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no direct connection to him, he is a person from my birthplace and that is why I am trying to make a strong presence. Is this a problem or is this making any relation with the subject?

Concern regarding Draft:Zaeem Ahmed

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Foyjul90. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zaeem Ahmed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zaeem Ahmed

[edit]

Hello, Foyjul90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zaeem Ahmed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Foyjul90&oldid=1111359901"