User talk:Foxtrot5151

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Foxtrot5151, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Prisoner of War Medal. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 15:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Half Million Award

		The Half Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Medal of Honor (estimated annual readership: 814,448) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 13:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know this little award might be long overdue, but hopefully it still shows that the Wikipedia community appreciates what you and a few other editors did to improve the quality of this important article. Thanks! Bobnorwal (talk) 13:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Foxtrot5151. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of ibid in citations

Hi Foxtrot5151. I noticed that in your edits on Billy Mitchell, you used the term ibid in some of the citations. Since ibid is totally dependent on the content of the immediately preceding citation, and any editor could make a change that disrupts that connection by inserting an intervening citation or moving text around, it (and also any other of the Latin citation abbreviations) should not be used. Could you convert those to proper Wikipedia citation format? Indyguy (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations before the Senate Armed Services Commitee, Second Session, 106th Congress

Been meaning to ask this for some time. Usually, sourcing for dates of rank of four-star military officers is easy, as they often appear in news articles of their promotions, videos of their promotion ceremonies, or appendices in their Senate Armed Services Committee nomination hearing documents. The latter are digitized. However, a particular one is missing from the GovInfo archives: the one for the second session of the 106th Congress.

This document stands out as all the other ones (including the 106th's first session) during this period have been digitized. This document contains the dates of rank of GEN Tommy R. Franks, GEN William F. Kernan and LTG Robert B. Flowers, among others, which will prove useful for List of United States Army lieutenant generals from 1990 to 1999, List of United States Army lieutenant generals from 2000 to 2009 and List of United States Army four-star generals. The Army four-star generals page has Kernan sitting pretty without a specific rank date (currently stuck at July 2000) since its creation.

My question is, do you happen to have that PDF in your research archive anywhere that I can use? If not, do you have tips on who to contact and how an email to them should look like, especially if it's the NARA legislative archive that you've contacted before? SuperWIKI (talk) 04:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I think it's S. 106-985? I didn't find it in govinfo either, but it came up on Google here: https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=4s8zAAAAIAAJ&source=gbs_book_other_versions. Is that it? It's also coming up on ProQuest Congressional, which a lot of libraries have access to. Foxtrot5151 (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Officer Military Personnel Records

Do you have any past experience requesting non-publicly available service records/General Officer Management Office (GOMO) biographies? The reason why I ask is because some officers in this list, among others, don't have a specific date of rank (DOR). Still can't find the DORs of Alexander Haig, Sam S. Walker and William F. Kernan (even after searching S. 106-985). So far, I've tried requesting the GOMO biographies of these officers from the U.S. Army Center of Military History at Fort McNair but haven't got anything back yet for the past week. Doesn't help that the trio, among others I'm looking for, retired after 1960.

May I have some tips on how to request DORs, seeing as requesting details from the National Personnel Records Center looks very painful? This includes, especially if you got Doolittle's records from the NPRC, what the NPRC email is (they don't seem to have a publicly-listed one since 2011), how to format an email asking for DORs as a Wikipedian (highly specific and unusual for them, I assume) and other tips from your past experience. SuperWIKI (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any secret for access, but I did happen to run across a huge grouping on Haig's retirement because it was a mess. That may well include his date of rank. You'll find the entire thing digitized by the Ford Library here: https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/document/0019/4520749.pdf Foxtrot5151 (talk) 21:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. What was initially a simple search for Haig's DOR (among others) led me down a rabbit hole that I may or may not need clarification on.

Firstly, on the DOR. Pages 11 and 30 of the document you sent me states that "Alexander M. Haig Jr., returned on 4 January 1973, to the Army staff, having been assigned on that date as Vice Chief of Staff of the Army". Given how many documents are unnecessarily wishy-wishy on terminology, it's fairly safe to assume that Haig's four-star DOR is also 4 January 1973. Additionally, his career track seems to be clear here as well:

Promoted to four-star general on 4 January 1973, concurrent with assignment as Army vice chief until 4 May 1973
Reassigned as White House chief of staff while on active list from 4 May 1973 to 31 July 1973 (non-civilian)
Retired on 31 July 1973 with retirement date of 1 August 1973
Served as civilian (White House chief of staff) until 21 September 1974

The rabbit hole is when he actually started as vice chief of staff. We can go with the usual guess of 4 January, but we have two separate sources saying he become VCSA in September or October 1972 (page 27), the latter coming from an oral interview with Haig himself. And if that wasn't enough, we have the VCSA Wikipedia page claiming he started on 1 February 1973. These dates are confusing, especially since I can't find a definitive list of VCSAs (they focus too much on the CSA). SuperWIKI (talk) 02:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The NPRC records for Doolittle were digitized under a special program--it only applies to celebrities. I checked, and Haig wasn't important enough to qualify, unfortunately. Foxtrot5151 (talk) 21:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Posting at top of talk pages

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Medal of Honor were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. - wolf 21:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not signing talk page posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Medal of Honor, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - wolf 22:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Foxtrot5151. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Talk:Medal of Honor#Clarification of symbolic awards, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - wolf 07:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Shearonink

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Wounded Knee Massacre § Massacre? Mass Shooting? - what to state in the lead section. Shearonink (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]