Vandalism at Monty Hall

Hello, I'm SPACKlick. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Monty Hall problem has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.SPACKlick (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Monty Hall problem has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Monty Hall problem was changed by FourthKind (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915034 on 2016-02-14T14:27:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, FourthKind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jonpatterns (talk) 13:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monty Hall argument

Hi - Can you answer the questions here? -- Rick Block (talk) 16:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The vos Savant “Goat” is Revealed

You addition of the section on the above to Talk:Game theory‎‎ breaks many wikipedia policies. It looks like Wikipedia:No original research as there are no references to published material, it breaks WP:NOTFORUM as wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. It break Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines as it is not relating to the content of the article. Repeated reinsertion of the same material will lead to a successions of warning and possibly a block. --Salix alba (talk): 10:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please read this essay?

FourthKind, can you please read the essay Wikipedia:HONEYTRAP and tell me if anything that it explains sounds familiar to you? You don't seem to think in the same way as the majority of other editors, and this makes it difficult having a conversation with you. I wonder if you are not a neurotypical editor (no offense intended), in which case it would help us all to follow the advice in that essay, which was compiled by other editors in that situation. Thanks for your time. Diego (talk) 15:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still not willing to fill out the table?

Hi - Why are you so unwilling to fill out the table about 300 shows? Do you have no idea what numbers to put? Doing this really, truly will help. Like I said here, I'm not going to comment on your thoughts until you do this. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And, BTW, this is directly related to the exact point you are trying to make. VSM is talking about all 300 of the shows I want you to think about. MHP is not. Fundamentally, this is what you are saying. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still don't understand?

Hi - Based on this edit it appears you still don't understand that at Q2, in reality, the odds are 1/3:2/3 - not 1/2:1/2.

Can we talk about this right here?

Please reply "yes" or "no" (no long lectures, please). -- Rick Block (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given your continued posts at both talk:Monty Hall problem and Talk:Monty_Hall_problem/Arguments I gather your answer is "no". OK. Have a nice life. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]