User talk:Fordx12/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Fordx12. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
AN/I notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RidjalA.The discussion is about the topic La Luz del Mundo. Thank you. Ajaxfiore (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties and no further comment is made at the opened filing, it may be failed and suggested that the next logical course of action be formal mediation. Please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Failed". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. UseTheCommandLine (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Request for Assistance
Hi - thank you for your recent input on my miscataloged dispute. I don't have any experience with disputes but am under impression I am supposed to ask for another opinion first. Can I ask for yours? After closing my dispute, the situation for me seems to have gone from bad to worse. I'm thinking a Wikibreak for me might be best but I don't know if there are any other options. I'm becoming personally concerned with the increasing level of aggression being directed at me by another editor. I know I may be violating a WP policy in asking for your help, but I'm not sure the most appropriate method for resolution at this point, and hope that might be taken into consideration.
I'm also wondering if I'm getting a little paranoid. After I discovered the 7-sockpuppet hive on Ronan Farrow, which was banned, a large number of IP editors began participating in Ronan Farrow; also a long dormant WP account reactivated to participate in Ronan Farrow and aggressively challenge my edits by declaring them POV. AsadR, who singularly undid most of the edits to Ronan Farrow that had removed promotional language, was last active on WP in 2008 during which he edited, almost exclusively, Ronan Farrow. He then reactivated on WP 5 years later, on October 6 - the day the socks were shut down - to begin participating in the Ronan Farrow edit discussion on the side of inserting promotional material and supporting the other editor who said I needed to have my "behavior" addressed by admins. I'm either crazy (at this point, I feel like it) or this article is being heavily gamed. I don't want to start a crusade to expose anyone, I just don't want to be the one whole gets blocked through a coordinated campaign to keep this article as a promotional bio. I really feel like I'm pushing a stone uphill by myself right now and don't know here to turn. Thanks, in advance. BlueSalix (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I do believe that this is harassment and find the edits from AsadR to be suspicious. However I think you may find this to be a long and hard process. You made several good faith edits, but unfortunately they were reverts which still count towards the 3R rule. Be very careful when reverting, even edits done manually can be considered reverts if they undue another previous edit. I say this not because I think that you intended to be disruptive, they seem like they were done in good faith. However if you seek admin help too hastley it may backfire. I am willing to help you by walking you throw the process, but you must be patient, be calm, and realize that it can be tricky. I am very busy, so this wont be resolved quickly. Are you in?Fordx12 (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- I removed some posts under WP:TALKO for personal attacks and off topic. I do not attribute any blame or guilt to users named in my above comments. I am merely attempting to show a fellow editor the proper steps to seek a resolution with a dispute with other good faith editors WP:AGF and expressed a sense of suspicion with the edit history of one other editor. Fordx12 (talk) 00:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I noticed that you put yourself for an Admin review, that is what I was going to suggest. If you want to, you could also take it to the community and have other editors review you as well, since Admins make take some time WP:ER. Before you can open up an RfC on User Conduct, you must read this [[]]. Basically two posters would have to have talked with the individuals invovled on talkpages. Make your feelings known, request kindly what you would like them to do, and end it there. No emotions, just "I feel that your comments have been less than cordial and this in turn has made editing difficult." that sort of thing.
- If you need to go into an RfC on User Conduct, you'll need to prepare a sandbox with the following
-Diffs that show cooperation in the past (just a sample) -Links/Diffs from the RfC (Samples) that brought about the behavior. -Diffs that show uncivil behavior (once again, just samples). -Diffs that show attempts to remedy the situation. Your goal is not to punish, but to seek assistance and outside help to come to a peaceful understanding. Fordx12 (talk) 00:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank You
Hi - I just checked in to WP for the first time in awhile lately. I decided to just quit; the issue of the bullying was just too much for me to handle right now. I did want to let you know that User:AsadR - the editor the "other user" in question was citing to achieve consensus and justify my treatment - has been blocked as the 9th single-purpose Ronan Farrow sockpuppet account. Unfortunately, the damage to that article is already done and editing it to remove the promotional inserts is totally off-limits at this point due to the extreme abuse to which the "remaining identity" subjects others. Nonetheless, I wanted to at least thank you for supporting me in filing the sock motion against the AsadR identity, and for being the one person who offered me some help and direction during my time on WP. While the publicist has many more identities active on that entry right now ready to remove unflattering information and name-call editors, it - at least - makes me feel good that I could help to identify one in the multitude and that I wasn't as wicked and disgusting of a person as the "other user" said I was. Thank you again for all your help. BlueSalix (talk) 02:06, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| for providing an ear to listen during a period of extreme bullying BlueSalix (talk) 02:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hello Fordx12, I hope you haven't run into any troubles lately. I'm leaving this courtesy note on your talk page to let you know I've given an editor review of you at the above linked page, just in case you come back and have forgotten about it. Best wishes! TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 26 December 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
DRN needs assistance
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)