User talk:Folau111

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Wests Tigers, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sydney Roosters, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •Florrie•leave a note• 00:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hull Kingston Rovers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. •Florrie•waltz a matilda• 05:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Hull Kingston Rovers. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •Florrie•waltz a matilda• 12:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

1 month block. It has been pointed out that this account has made the same edits as User:124.179.79.34, who is currently blocked for edit warring/non-consensual editing. LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Karmichael Hunt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. florrie 11:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fraser Anderson, you will be blocked from editing. florrie 13:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dominique Peyroux

Hi, I noticed that you created Dominique Peyroux, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009 - again

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Clinton Schifcofske. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. florrie 06:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danny Mills (rugby league)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Danny Mills (rugby league), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable, no refs, Google search doesn't confirm the core assertion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Mark Chovain 07:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dominique Peyroux

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominique Peyroux, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, stub, nothing real from Google search, unlikely to expand (permastub), dosen't meet guidelines set out by the WikiProject of Rugby league. In short, a useless article unlikely to go anywhere.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selasi Berdie

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Selasi Berdie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, stub, nothing real from Google search, unlikely to expand (permastub), dosen't meet guidelines set out by the WikiProject of Rugby league. In short, a useless article unlikely to go anywhere. Is not a hoax, but a lower grade player. If this biography becomes notable, it will be easy to recreate page with sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Will Naitoro

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Will Naitoro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, stub, nothing real from Google search, unlikely to expand (permastub), dosen't meet guidelines set out by the WikiProject of Rugby league. In short, a useless article unlikely to go anywhere. Is not a hoax, but a lower grade player. If this biography becomes notable, it will be easy to recreate page with sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sisa Waqa

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sisa Waqa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, stub, nothing real from Google search, unlikely to expand (permastub), dosen't meet guidelines set out by the WikiProject of Rugby league. In short, a useless article unlikely to go anywhere. Is not a hoax, but a lower grade player. If this biography becomes notable, it will be easy to recreate page with sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful Advice

Hi, I see that many of your rugby league edits have been reverted and some pages you created are currently up for deletion. If I may say so here are a few things to take on board:

A player should only have a page if they have played first grade before, for example I have been able to improve Selasi Berdie because he has.
Use references to back up claims made in articles. For example Selasi Berdie needs a link to a newspaper article or similar that says he is the first Ghanian to play in the NRL. This is an encyclopedia and so facts must be able to be proven.
A player should not be in a category unless the article mentions that he is that nationality, with evidence to back it up. Just adding someone to Category:Jamacian rugby league players is less helpful than mentioning in the article that he has a Jamaican parent for example.
Sporting Nationality is different from Ancestry. That's why Clinton Schifcofske does not belong in Category:Polish rugby league players (he has never played for Poland), but he could belong in Category:Australians of Polish descent.

I hope this advice helps you improve your edits and become a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. If you have any questions just ask, regards Mattlore (talk) 10:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from SpecialWindler

Well, it is only proposed deletion, you have 5 days before it will be deleted, and if you address the concerns raised on the proposed deletion template, then the articles will stay. From their current form, however, they are just not meeting notability guidelines. I'm watching these pages, and this page, so I'll know if they are fixed or not, thankyou The Windler talk 11:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Will Naitoro

I have nominated Will Naitoro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Naitoro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mark Chovain 11:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Dene Halatau. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A public message board is not a reliable source. florrie 14:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Warrington Wolves. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GW(talk) 22:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Craig Wing. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. florrie 14:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hayden James

I have nominated Hayden James, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden James. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Windler talk 21:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Folau111. You have new messages at Florrie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. X MarX the Spot (talk) 11:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Alexf^(talk) 12:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Folau111! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 87 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Josua Koroibulu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rynard Pretorius

The article Rynard Pretorius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of playing in any international matches against other full IRLF members - so fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andre Louder

The article Andre Louder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of playing in any international matches against other full IRLF members - so fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]