User talk:FlashMechy

Welcome!

Hi FlashMechy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 20:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCG Machines (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCG Machines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 17:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BuySomeApples,

I have thoroughly read through the Wikipedia article for notability, and I believe that five of the 14 cited references meet the four criteria of being in-depth, reliable, secondary, and strictly independent sources. One citation is a press release which was published by an independent news organization - I will remove this one. The other references are supporting material, such as citations for government grant funding, professional society memberships, and a patent publication. These remaining citations all meet the bar for three of the four reference criteria, but are not in-depth. Should I remove these supporting citations as well?

Many thanks,

Flash FlashMechy (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FlashMechy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 17:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCG Machines (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCG Machines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello FlashMechy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FlashMechy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FlashMechy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 09:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong,

Thank you for your detailed message, and my apologies for my delayed response; I was not feeling well yesterday. I have thoroughly reviewed both the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements and the conflict of interest pages, and believe myself to be a neutral party. I am not, nor have I been, paid or commissioned to work on this article, though I am genuinely interested in what this company is doing. I have a colleague who works at TCG Machines, but they are not an owner. It is my understanding of the COI guidelines that this does not present a conflict of interest, but if I am mistaken, then I will add a COI declaration.

This is my first attempt at a Wikipedia article, so I do apologize if I have missed the mark in terms of neutral tone. If you could provide me with some specifics on which sections need to be changed or removed, that would be very much appreciated. I have done my best to emulate other business pages which have the "good article" status, such as the Tesla page. FlashMechy (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Theroadislong,

Just touching base and hoping for an update.

Thank you. FlashMechy (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong,

It's been over a month now since you asked that I not proceed with edits until answering your message. I took that to mean that I require your acknowledgement before continuing with edits or a resubmission. I would very much appreciate your feedback so that I know if I am clear to resubmit this article. FlashMechy (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this in passing. I'll ping Theroadislong, but please explain what you mean by "I have a colleague who works at TCG Machines"- typically a colleague is someone who works with you, so if they work there but you don't, please explain. 331dot (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot,

Thank you for your response! I was beginning to feel like I was alone on the internet. My colleague and I shared a previous employer (not TCG Machines), so we have that social connection. They now work at TCG Machines, and I have been able to ask them for clarity as I have created this article. FlashMechy (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that would count as a conflict of interest; typically articles are written without any communication with the subject(or its representatives) or even the knowledge of the subject. That you are in communication with a company employee is something other editors should be aware of. 331dot (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My interpretation from Wikipedia's conflict of interest page was that I am at arms length. Specifically this passage:

"Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic, legal, or financial (including holding a cryptocurrency)—can trigger a COI. How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern on Wikipedia is governed by common sense."

But I am fine with flagging myself as being a conflict of interest, as my situation can clearly be interpreted as such. I am new to Wiki, so please forgive my lack of process here. As I understand it, I need to place this:{{connected contributor}} at the top of the affected talk page, which would be the Talk Page for the article. I will attempt to do that now. FlashMechy (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So on Wikipedia, the spirit of a rule matters more than the letter. Do you have the most serious conflict of interest? Probably not, but it's something that people should be aware of, for openness and transparency. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Totally, and happy to do right by the ideals of Wikipedia. Please excuse me as I struggle to get this template implemented.

Thank you for your help! FlashMechy (talk) 15:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I believe I got it. Thank you again for your time and help. FlashMechy (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So the notice you placed on this page is meant for article or draft talk pages, not user talk pages. WP:COI describes the format to use for a notice on your user page, User:FlashMechy. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's my bad, I think I have it correctly now (on my user page), but please let me know if I'm still off base.

As for next steps, should I wait for Theroadislong to respond, or should I resubmit the article? FlashMechy (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have satisfied the need for a response, so you may proceed with your editing. 331dot (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, I'll resubmit this shortly. One last question for you: should I remove the "Undisclosed paid|date=November 2023" tag at the top of the article, or does that need to be a decision for a non-COI editor to make? FlashMechy (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot, I'm just following-up to say that I am going to remove the "Undisclosed paid|date=November 2023" tag from the draft article, based on this Talk page thread. If this is something I should not do, please feel free to let me know or revert the change.

Again, highly appreciative of your time and help. FlashMechy (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCG Machines (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fermiboson was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editing two sentences in this entire article cannot be construed as "removing advertisement" in any sense. You need a complete rewrite. Remove the fluff, the "life-long", "avid", and trivia largely sourced from primary sources. The sourcing appears to be better, on a positive note.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TCG Machines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fermiboson (talk) 12:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fermiboson,

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission. Please appreciate that my latest, minor edit was not the only attempt I have made to write this article in a neutral manner. I can certainly do more, but I think we may just disagree on what is "fluff" and what is relevant information. The idea of an encyclopedia article (or more specifically, a Wikipedia article, in this case) is to present information on a topic. That said, I take your point, and I will try and cut down on extraneous information.

Of note, the word "avid" does not appear in this article, so I am not sure what you are referring to there. The word "lifelong" is used, and I will remove it in my next edit. If you have any other specific criticisms, I would be happy to hear them so I can address them directly.

Thanks again. FlashMechy (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Fermiboson,

I have gone through and done my best to trim out all extraneous information. Please let me know if this latest edit now reads in a more acceptable, neutral manner, and I will resubmit. Again, if you have any specific critiques, I am happy to implement them.

Much obliged. FlashMechy (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fermiboson,

I will be resubmitting this article for review now, but I would still welcome any further insights you would like to provide.

Have a good day. FlashMechy (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TCG Machines has been accepted

TCG Machines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 23:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]