User talk:FjodrSoyevskji

Syncplify, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Syncplify! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (Missionedit) (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Syncplify.me Server! (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Libby norman (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syncplify.me Server! (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syncplify.me Server! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 17:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syncplify.me Server! (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syncplify.me Server! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Syncplify.me Server!

Hello, Syncplify. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Syncplify.me Server!".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Syncplify.me Server!}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syncplify.me Server! (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MorbidEntree was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syncplify.me Server! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 09:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syncplify.me Server! has been accepted

Syncplify.me Server!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},^{(unless this is on my own talk page)} otherwise I may not see your reply) 13:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 07:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

FjodrSoyevskji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16043 was submitted on Jun 27, 2016 10:25:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

FjodrSoyevskji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

FjodrSoyevskji (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry I used a company name, I respectfully ask the account to be renamed to FjodrSoyevskji which is my personal first and last name. I never spammed Wikipedia and I promise I never will. All of my original content was approved by Wikipedia reviewers after careful review and many back-forth adjustments and modifications to ensure its neutrality. And I am willing to keep improving my contributions to make them even more neutral. Thank you.

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the unblock request that you sent using the UTRS system, you have referred to yourself as "we" several times. Is this account used by more than one person? What is the connection between you and the company you are writing about? Do you have any WP:COI? If so, please declare it. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I used "we" is because the company has been accused, so when I defend the company from an unfair accusation I use "we". BUT the only person to whom the account belongs is myself, Fjodr Soyevskji. I am the CTO of Syncplify (the company) so I guess that qualifies as COI. Even though we could write books on what is and what is not a COI, and according to which theory. But I understand that's not the point. I am used to "wear many hats", for example I am a university professor as well as a CTO as well as a consultant to several other companies, and each time I wear a different hat I do so with the utmost professionalism, without favoring my "other hats" or taking advantage of the circumstantial position. My only interest here is to improve Wikipedia by providing a better completeness of information on a topic that Wikipedia was covering only partially. I am willing to continue doing so, constantly improving, staying away from bias. Being requested to improve a document/page on Wikipedia is always reasonable, and I will always be more than happy to do so. Being unfairly accused of spamming, on the other hand, makes me feel quite uneasy, as you can imagine.

I am willing to unblock you, but only under condition that you will not be making WP:COI edits in connection to your company. I don't care about any "theories", Wikipedia's WP:COI guidelines are very clear: COI editing is strongly discouraged. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Deal. I will not be editing any page that has a direct or indirect connection to any company that I work with or consult with. Promise.