User talk:Fjgdh5

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Fjgdh5, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 03:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms of the Mughal Empire moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Coat of Arms of the Mughal Empire, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Emblem of the Mughal Empire, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troglokhan

The article Troglokhan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources cited, likely not a notable fictional character.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 15:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Troglokhan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Troglokhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mughal Empire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 20:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal War

You created a new page called Bengal War. Please add references to support the statements made within it and either remove the empty sections or add some referenced content there. The page also needs categories to help other users find it - do please add these. Many thanks Nick Moyes (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and talk page comments

Hi. As I suggest above, please read up on our sourcing policies. WP:V and WP:RS in particular. WP:INDISCRIMINATE would also be helpful. Also, please make new talk page comments at the bottom of the talk page. And do remember to sign them. Best. --regentspark (comment) 01:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 02:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:2019 India–Pakistan standoff. regentspark (comment) 17:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]