User talk:Fjeowu
Relativity of simultaneity
[edit]See Talk:Relativity of simultaneity#Poincaré mention in lead. Also, always assume good faith from your fellow editors. See wp:AGF. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Fjeowu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- @VQuakr Thank you for your kind wellcome.
- I understand I commented a little bit bad to other editor, but, as you konw, it is also not good behavior that removing other's all contribution without clear reason.
- I experienced that whenever I added statements about works of scholars(other than Einstein) to theory of relativity documents, editors JUST remove all my addition and says "grammartical error" so I make more smooth exprssion, than says "it is already mentioned in other part" something like that. If it is grammatically wrong, then they should correct grammar rather then removing my sentences completely.
- I want to emphasize that a wikipedia document is not belong to one author. And, in fact, greate theories developed by many excellent scholars, not by just one scholar. Writting about theories without mention of important contributers makes misunderstanding about the development of theories that as if theories usually made by only one or two scholars. Fjeowu (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed it would be nice if people only reverted when necessary, but ultimately discussion and focus on the content not the editors is the path forward. Musing about other editors' motivations never helps. VQuakr (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- @VQuakr Ok agree with you. Thanks. ;) Fjeowu (talk) 20:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed it would be nice if people only reverted when necessary, but ultimately discussion and focus on the content not the editors is the path forward. Musing about other editors' motivations never helps. VQuakr (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)