Jump to content

User talk:Fitzcarmalan/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Welcome!

Hello, Fitzcarmalan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Flat Out let's discuss it 16:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Welcome & a comment on your edit

Regarding your edit on Ak party, Islamic democracy is against Turkish constitution. The party could be banned if it were to support any from of "Islamic democracy". Kavas (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Sometimes parties can have hidden agendas and won't publicly announce it especially if their policies are not accepted by constitution. In papers only it's a secular party but you can't prevent them from being Islamists and from having religious policies in real life because it's simply NOT possible even if they keep denouncing their nature. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 18:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
"allegedly" is a good word to use in writing the article text for such claims. Kavas (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


It is not needed because there is already a section on the page called "Ideology" where it is stated that some people perceive the party as Islamic leaning or whatever. There are people in the US who call the US Democratic party Communists. But I haven't seen in the the column of the party Communism [party] but modern liberalism. So be consistent or we gonna add all the "perceived ideologies by certain groups have of a political party then? So it is not needed for it is already stated under the section Ideology.

1. It is forbidden by the Turkish constitutions to be a Islamic democracy or whatever party. 2. If one looks at the pages of many other political parties around world for example the democratic party of the US. Many conservative people perceive the democratic party as a communist or a socialist party. Is this stated in that column? NO. Germany's CSU is a conservative Christian Bavarian party, a lot of people call it Christian Taliban party (fundamentalist) but I haven't seen it on their page. Lets make it closer. CHP is the second political party in Turkey. Officially it is a social democrat party however if any one looks further and examines the things said and actions (policies) taken by this political party in the past. You cannot say this is a social democrat party (as one in western Europe) but a conservative nationalist party (as it is also perceived by a huge section of the Turkish people) but again this not added in the column. 3. The sources you have added are biased. Sources like "Jihad against Alcohol" What Jihad? There has only one law passed that regulates Alcohol sales, the law puts in line with standards in many western nations. Tell me in how many European nations you can buy alcohol after 22:00 (bars and clubs excluded)? In the Netherlands you can't buy alcohol after 22:00 besides bars and clubs. 4. Like I said before there is already a section called IDEOLOGY where is stated what the party is perceived as. 5. When you say things like they have Islamic agenda and the AKP is a pure Islamist party, you are already saying what you are thinking about them. So go spread somewhere else your propaganda.--Liesbeth98 (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Fitzcarmalan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Fitzcarmalan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Egypt July 26 demonstration sizes

G'day,

Thank you for working to improve the Aftermath of the 2013 Egyptian coup d'état wikipedia page, and including more Egyptian sources. I think you have misunderstood the Ahram online report - the 30 million figure is the total number of demonstrators over the whole of July - I think they added up the size of each day's demonstrations. Likewise the 1 million pro-Morsi demonstrators is over the whole of July.

The section you and I have updated is for July 26 only - the day General Al-Sisi called for a demonstration is support of the coup, and the Muslim Brotherhood called for demonstrations against it. The old figure "hundreds of thousands" was probably too low - I was using a cautious reading of the "million" claim in CBS and al Jazeera, partly being cautious in response to pro-Morsi vandalism. The Egypt Independent article does say "an official security source said" 29 million on Friday, but that seems to contradict everyone else, and may be propaganda.

Can you revisit those figures - both 30 million and 1 million seem much too high for 26 July.

Thanks, Sailfish2 (talk) 00:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Good day to you,
Sorry for the late reply, i've been away for a while. Maybe that's a good point there, 30 million demonstrators in a population of only 82 million is quite exaggerating and yes, you're right about the Ahram Online article so i can replace it with this one--->[1]
As you can see, this article says that they were 35 million and of course it's more than too high so it wouldn't make a difference. The number is very popular here and a lot of people and most TV reporters claim it. On the 30th of June, it was also estimated that 30 million took to the streets but others said they were only 14 million. If you agree that they were 30 million that day, then i can tell you that the numbers on the 26th of July were way higher. I demonstrated myself on both days, the 30th and the 26th, around the Presidential Palace. But on the 26th the masses were so big it was like 2 persons/m2 at night and it was nearly impossible to reach the palace itself. On the other hand, pro-Morsi demonstrators always claimed they were "millions" but in fact they were only tens of thousands and they were mostly in Cairo, especially Raba'a Square--->[2][3]
Overall, i'm going to satisfy you. I'll just say they were millions and that the pro-Morsi demonstrators were a few thousands but i'm sure there are many sources claiming so and i'll also add the sources i mentioned above.Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Well, i guess i was too late...
I'll still add the sources though.Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Fitzcarmalan. I was pretty sure that the 1 million pro-Morsi demonstrators figure was wrong, and wanted to correct it. The demonstrations in support of removing Morsi sound immense - more than my country's population! I changed the article myself partly because I wanted to reduce the pro-Morsi number which wasn't supported by the other sources. Overall I don't think the precise number matters, but I think you now have a couple of sources saying 29 million and 30 million.
Sailfish2 (talk) 23:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenia–Egypt relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quiet Storm (album) (September 25)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Egyptian protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian uprising (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quiet Storm (album) (October 24)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 20:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC 2013 protests in Tunisia was accepted

2013 protests in Tunisia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lugia2453 (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

HI,iam from egypt too and i am editor in arabic wikipedia,you can join us to contribute in your mother tongue language here is my talk page [4] if you want any help talk to me,and finally good luck,i wish to see you soon edit on arabic wikipedia--أحمد توفيق (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, your offer is much appreciated and i will surely consider it but give me some time please. My priority is to raise Egypt and the Arab world's image globally because not everyone speaks Arabic like us. But i assure you that very soon i will begin working on Arabic projects. Thanks again! Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quiet Storm (Aly & Fila album) (December 2)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 14:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Query

Did you have consensus to do this? --John (talk) 20:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I already explained the reason for my edit +"Sit-ins dispersal" is the Arabic Wikipedia term used for the article. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I take that as a "no". It's better to seek consensus on talk pages before making potentially controversial moves, which this was. WP:RM is another possible way to do moves. I'm going to restore the previous title while you follow one of these avenues, if you still want to move the article. Please don't do this again as it makes trouble for others. Thanks. --John (talk) 21:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Alright then, i'm discussing this on the article's talk page but i'm tired of waiting for ages till someone replies. And btw i also hate to do similar moves without consensus. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC 2013 Middle East cold snap was accepted

2013 Middle East cold snap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Egypt–Ethiopia relations was accepted

Egypt–Ethiopia relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000(talk) 04:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Neutrality Notification

Information icon I am Mohamed Hassan. I have just reverted your edits to 2013 Egyptian coup d'état article as you have removed referenced and relevant information. As I've reviewed the news-link (the reference) and it matches information added. Please try to edit within the Wikipedia neutral philosophy. Please try to keep an unbiased status. —Preceding undated comment added 17:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

The source mentioned does not represent any government's official response and it broadly mentions "Israel" and a bunch of "diplomats" without being any specific, which still doesn't represent a government response. You accuse me of being biased but i don't see how the section i removed was unbiased.. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about "unbaised" term because I don't really know why you did remove it. However again the paragraph/sentence didn't mention that it's a government response either. It only repeated what's in the reference which is general term of the "Israeli diplomats". If you want you can relocate the information to another place in article but please don't remove.
@User:Mohamedhp, stop harassing fellow editors and relent of your quarrelsome behavior at 2013 Egyptian coup d'état. Otherwise you will end up in a block/ Tkuvho (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

AfC confusion

Wikipedia_talk: is the preferred namespace for articles for creation. When you have created such a draft, do not put anything on the matching title in the Wikipedia: namespace. Doing so serves no useful purpose except to cause confusion. You may care to start using the new draft: namespace - where you do put articles in draft: and only use draft_talk: for the usual purpose of any talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Alright, sorry about that. Thought it would be more helpful rather than confusing.. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Template:Sinai insurgency was accepted

Template:Sinai insurgency, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl t c 14:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Template:Islamist unrest in Egypt (2013–present) was accepted

Template:Islamist unrest in Egypt (2013–present), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl t c 15:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fitzcarmalan/Archive_1&oldid=1143003407"