Jump to content

User talk:Firestar464/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map

Good day! Thank you for the notification about my 2 corrections of Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map. Now I gave a source for one of it. For the second I need to get additional clarification. As for now the city of Fastiv is far away from the current frontline. I'm living nearby and know it for sure. P.S. Just now you reverted my first correction based on TASS consolidated report. I don't understand the reason. But prefer to not touch the module anymore. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

TASS is not a reliable source for anything that isn't a Russian government statement, so it unfortunately can't be used. However, if your claim is true, reliable media sources will report on it soon. Firestar464 (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
The point is that TASS message that I used was based on Russian Ministry of Defence statement. Anyway my reverted correction was re-added by other user. So this issue is closed. Talking about so called encirclement of Fastiv I have to stress again, thanks God, there is no Russian forces at all. I'm living in this region and know it better. But I don't understand how to prove it's absence by reliable sources. It is definitely someone's mistake that still present in the discussed module. Vasyatka1 (talk) 11:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh okay I will revert it back Firestar464 (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

dude is notable simply for dying

Andrey Mordvichev, Russian lieutenant general, ‘notable simply for dying’, odd, imho, thus recreated (combining data from "Andrei...), reminds me my 1st art. created in enwi, little green men (why indeed, so little, not so green, and, why only ‘men’, gender equality, etc...); good luck!☆☆☆—PietadèTalk 19:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Dude, I don't understand. Could you please clarify? Firestar464 (talk) 06:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Discussion about your participation to the map of the Russian-Ukrainian war

Hello, I am a journalist for a French newspaper called Me Parisien and would like to know if we could chat by email or phone about the way you help mapping the Ukrainian-Russian war. This can obviously be anonymous. My email: valexandre @ leparisien.fr 213.152.9.2 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Register first. Cool guy (talkcontribs) • m 18:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
The IP has been globally blocked, FYI. Firestar464 (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-15

19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-16

23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

Tech News: 2022-17

22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Popivka & Pishchane

Hi. You asked why I had suppressed Popivka and Pishchane in Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map; the reason was that both have a population below 1000, and neither is front-line.

  • Pishchane [uk] is arguably front-line, by the metric that there are places on the map where Pishchane is the closest labelled settlement, where instead contested Rubizhne would be the closest were Pishchane is removed. (However, it is normal to draw front lines up to contested settlements, so this metric is, in my view, irrelevant).
  • Popivka [uk] is not front line by the above metric, nor by any metric I can think of. Moreover, its population is 13, giving it the same prominence on the map as settlements almost 400 times as large.

While there isn't yet consensus on how to treat small settlements, I will not suppress these ones again till there is consensus (though you are welcome to do so if you have changed your mind). Regardless, for the sake of verifiability, I suggest that any settlements restored to the map also be restored to Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War. (A compromise option would be to mention very small settlements in the "More information" column of the nearest listed settlement in the same raion, as was done for Zelena Donyna.) AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 13:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-18

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War

Hi. Your most recent edits to Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War got the columns wrong. Can you fix please. Thanks. Nurg (talk) 04:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

 Done Firestar464 (talk) 05:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Excellent. Thank you. Nurg (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
BTW, here's a link on how to do named references, rather than duplicating refs [31]. Nurg (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Ikr but I forgot trout Self-trout Firestar464 (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-19

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Map edit

Mostly just effing around. Found it, wanted to fart around a little with the coding just to play. Didn't know I could sandbox that stuff. I know the standard Wiki coding, but not the fancy map stuff - I leave that to the pros (though it seems straightforward enough, if not exceedingly time-consuming). Had meant to do a "click-to-revert" but the newness of it made me feel it was easier to just do a manual revert. I even beat my 90 second window. ;) --WTRiker (talk) 06:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Well, one can experiment with Module:Sandbox. Firestar464 (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Reverting the last change to Whit Johnson's page.

Hi there, please see the corresponding article's talk page - I've been documenting as I go. I removed the line about Brownlee and Valles not because the source cited is bad but because the source doesn't contain anything about Brownlee and Valles. That text predated the inline sourcing. And I can't find another source that explains where Brownlee and Valles went in the aftermath.

And then I removed two of the career milestone dates for basically the same reason. They had been there without any citation as of a week ago, so initially I dug up tweets to try and substantiate the dates but in looking back at them they didn't precisely support what the text was claiming. I think if we can find an alternate source that does support the text as-written, that would be a better solution, but I haven't been able to quite find that yet. So I pared the text down to something that the source substantiates more confidently.

That all make sense? Not trying to vandalize the page, I'm actually trying to get it to a point where it's fully and accurately cited. Lmk what you want to do. Thanks.

Blunderbuss24 (talk) 05:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Sorry 'bout that Firestar464 (talk) 06:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
No worries! I appreciate the vigilance. Take care! Blunderbuss24 (talk) 06:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-20

18:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-21

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

Tech News: 2022-22

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-23

02:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-24

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-25

20:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

Tech News: 2022-26

20:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-27

19:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, Firestar, and thanks for your interest in this article. I must say I was pretty surprised by your tag. Many Wikipedia articles are written to document an event which has hit world headlines. I'm not too sure what kind of improvements you would like to see and why you consider the article to be outside wiki interests. You might like to expand on this on the article's talk page. You will note that the more recent 2022 Highland Park parade shooting is similarly based in news reports but remains untagged in this connection.--Ipigott (talk) 08:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-28

19:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-29

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-30

19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

Tech News: 2022-31

21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-32

19:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-33

21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-34

00:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-35

23:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

Tech News: 2022-36

23:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Don't know is this typo or not

In this edit, you link to "ontrol of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian...". Is this typo or not?(no need to reply me.) Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah that was an error Firestar464 (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-37

01:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-38

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-39

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Tech News: 2022-40

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Check citation

Hi. Can you please check the citation you added in your latest edit to Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War. The citation seems to be wrong in several aspects. Thanks. Nurg (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-41

14:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-43

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

25stargeneral (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

Tech News: 2022-44

MediaWiki message delivery 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-45

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-46

MediaWiki message delivery 21:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-47

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

Tech News: 2022-48

MediaWiki message delivery 20:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Pacific Rim National Park Reserve

Regarding this may I know what you believe was a copyvio? maclean (talk) 06:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

It got revdeled. Firestar464 (talk) 06:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I see that. I have taken it up with the admin. I expect admins to have a better understanding of Wikipedia:Copyright violations than that. maclean (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-49

MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-50

MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-51

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse

Why do you think that a sudden close of an active Teahouse discussion is a good idea? I don't get it, and I have 9,335 edits to the Teahouse. What am I missing here? Cullen328 (talk) 06:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I think we can all agree that the conspiracy rant was completely baseless, and I felt that any further commentary on the subject was thus unnecessary. If you disagree, feel free to reopen it, but IDK what else could be said. Firestar464 (talk) 07:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
I think that you made an error that was contrary to the Teahouse ethos, but I will not revert it. I really think that you should be much more careful in the future, though. Be slow to shut down discussion at the Teahouse, please. It is specifically designed to be a welcoming space. Cullen328 (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Please substitute {{nac}}

Hi here you forgot to substitute the template {{nac}}. Please substitute it using {{subst:nac}} --Matr1x-101 {user page - talk with me :) - contribs!} 10:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

trout Self-trout Haven't done this in a while. Firestar464 (talk) 03:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023