User talk:Firdayantinia

Speedy deletion nomination of Quebec Telemarketing

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Quebec Telemarketing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 08:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Quebec Telemarketing

A tag has been placed on Quebec Telemarketing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. PamD 08:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quebec_telemarketing. PamD 08:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Quebec Telemarketing (Inc)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quebec Telemarketing (Inc), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:MelanieN and User:JamesBWatson--JBW, I think you have a file folder full of other accounts for this one. Drmies (talk) 01:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Firdayantinia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it is not promotional content but writing about company stub on wiki, as well as existing page below;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_(restaurant,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Corporation,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Construction,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bramalea_(company), more on company stub categories. i think it have same criteria and not should be deletion nominator. if this page meet deletion page, so what is different with those existing page?--Firdayantinia (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No comment on those other articles (see WP:NOTTHEM), but yours were blatant spam, created as part of an entire campaign to spam Wikipedia. I'd say it's also pretty obvious that you violated not just Wikipedia's guidelines, but also the Terms of Use. Huon (talk) 01:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Madness is to do the same unsuccessful thing over and over again. Drmies (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it beyond you to realise that you are wasting your time trying to use Wikipedia for spam, because no matter how many accounts you create, your spam articles will keep getting deleted? Do you think just possibly you might find that you could use your time and effort more effectively in some other way? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JamesBWatson. Thanks for all information and advice. i am a new user on wikipedia and i would like to contribute write more article on wiki because i love writing. let's you know that i don't have any initation or interest to what i write. i just write based on interest issue on search engine, when i found more article talked one topics, i think i want to write it on wiki. now, i learn more about how to write on wiki. thanks for any advice and lets me improve my writing skill. thanks--Firdayantinia (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]