User talk:Finktron

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil E. Harris has been accepted

Cecil E. Harris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Finktron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AustralianRupert (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert O. Vorse, Jr. has been accepted

Albert O. Vorse, Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FiendYT ★ 03:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers.com

Yes, exceptions can be made to the 500 edit and and 6 month account age requirements. Your edit count is quite a bit short of 500, but you seem to have made good use of them. I suggest that you go ahead and apply for an account at the Newspapers.com project page. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Finktron. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 23:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just checked the message and followed the steps. Appreciate it! Cheers, Finktron (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Patrick D. Fleming has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Patrick D. Fleming. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick D. Fleming has been accepted

Patrick D. Fleming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naval Aviation Squadrons

Thanks for your work on updating the references for these. I originated a lot of them, with good references at the time, but then DANAS changed its setup and all the references went bad. I just didn't have the time or motivation to go back in and fix them, hoping that some heroic soul would take on that challenge. Good work! Or as they say in the Navy, Bravo Zulu. BTW, a list of the squadron articles I created is at User:Lou_Sander/Aircraft_Squadrons. Maybe it can be useful to you. Lou Sander (talk) 23:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Finktron. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelius N. Nooy has been accepted

Cornelius N. Nooy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil E. Harris

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Cecil E. Harris has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cecil E. Harris

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cecil E. Harris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 03:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cecil E. Harris

The article Cecil E. Harris you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cecil E. Harris for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK hook game

Hello, Finktron,

Writing the hook for a DYK is a bit of a parlor trick. It can be fun, testing your ingenuity. The aim is to draw the reader in with a statement that hooks the reader's interest; the constraints are, you can't invent anything. It may take some rewriting sometimes.

Grab the most interesting factoid you can find about the subject. Embody it in a single sentence. Add the relevant cite immediately after the sentence. I find it works best if that sentence is the final one in a paragraph, so you may want to shuffle sentence order in the para in question to situate your factoid in front of the cite.

In the present case, a reviewer may ask you to point out "landlocked" in your sources--or they may not. They may ask why the cite in the lead, as such is used in the lead only in cases of controversy. Personally, I find this lead not particularly interesting, though not to the point of objecting.

However, to me the most interesting thing about Harris is that he shot down four enemy planes on four different occasions. You may want to try that for a hook.

To summarize:
1. Put your hook(s) in a single sentence each.
2. Make it/them the most interesting fact(s) in the article.
3. Let the cite follow naturally after the hook.
4. It is perfectly fair to mislead your reader, but not to cheat them with made-up or irrelevant facts.

Have fun!Georgejdorner (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cecil E. Harris

Hi-I found a citation about a statue in honor of Cecil E. Harris on the Northern State University in Aberdeen, South Dakota. However, the word in the section about his education was confusing because the article had Northern State Teachers College which was of the initial names for Northern Michigan University. Confusing and not clear. My apologies for any problems. Hopeful, the citation about the state of Cecil E. Harris at Northern State University in Aberdeen, South Dakota is helpful. Thank you-RFD (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RFD: I appreciate that your edits were in good faith. I'm going to nix them just because I already have citations to his NSTC attendance after the next sentence, and an article about the statue on NSU campus already exists in the web cites for this article (cite [89] under Recognition section). Best, Finktron (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you-RFD (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Edward Ellis has been accepted

William Edward Ellis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 07:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cecil E. Harris

On 24 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cecil E. Harris, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cecil E. Harris, the U.S. Navy's second most successful World War II flying ace, was a school teacher from landlocked South Dakota? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cecil E. Harris. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cecil E. Harris), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I dropped back by to see how you were doing with your DYK nom, to find you have made a terrific start. Because you pulled over 5,000 page views, I listed your DYK on the Statistics page, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Statistics#February_2017. Good show!Georgejdorner (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Finktron. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is meta email - newspapers.com.
Message added 23:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ira Kepford

Article is now ready to move to mainspace. A couple of paras still need referencing, but not a serious deficiency. Mjroots (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjroots: Thanks! I moved it already, actually. Just lacking cites on those two paragraphs from the Cook book, but I'll try to snag page numbers next time I am at the library. I see the Talk page isn't actually made yet, though. It's still deleted from the PROD. Do you know how to reconstitute it, and if so how to add the article rating etc.? Thanks! Finktron (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WPs added and assessed. Mjroots (talk) 22:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formosa Air Battle

Hello, Finktron. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Formosa Air Battle at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! – Corinne (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Finktron – I have completed the copy-edit you requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. I enjoyed reading the article; it was quite well written. Please let me know if you have any questions. I have a few questions on minor issues:

1) A few times, I changed a number such as "10" to the word for the number, "ten". I usually do that for numbers of one or two digits (except in a science or math article). However, I stopped changing the number to the word about half-way through the article, particularly for number of enemy planes shot down. I thought I'd ask you first what you thought.

2) I added "the" before a ship's name ("the Houston) when it was missing, but not when it said "USS Houston".

3) I made dashes consistent – all spaced en-dashes. You had some en-dashes and some em-dashes.

4) In the first paragraph in Formosa Air Battle#Background you introduce the Sho plan. In the third paragraph of that section you discuss Sho 1 and Sho 2. The first mentions of those are un-hyphenated, and I added a no-break space between Sho and the number so it wouldn't break between them at the end of a line (the number will stay with the word). Then, at the end of that paragraph, you have "Sho-2", with a hyphen between Sho and "2". I left it as it was, but I have to ask you which you prefer: hyphenated or un-hyphenated. These should be consistent.

5) I'm going to copy the second paragraph of Formosa Air Battle#Background here for ease of reference, highlighting a phrase in bold:

By 10 October Toyoda's tour of the front was complete. He intended to depart from Formosa for Japan that same day but was forced to change his plans. Surprise U.S. carrier strikes against the Ryukyu Islands cut off Toyoda's flight path home, grounding the admiral far from Combined Fleet headquarters at a decisive moment. Out of position and with inadequate lines of communication, the response to such overwhelming enemy air power was left to Toyoda's Chief of Staff, Admiral Ryūnosuke Kusaka.

I paused at the phrase "such overwhelming enemy air power". All I could see in the preceding sentences that could remotely be seen as "overwhelming air power" was "Surprise U.S. carrier strikes against the Ryukyu Islands". I don't see any indication that anything was overwhelming. I think you either need to provide details as to how the U.S. air power was overwhelming or change "the response to such overwhelming enemy air power" to "the response to these attacks (or strikes)".

6) I see you have used "U.S." as the abbreviation for "United States" throughout the article. I don't know if this abbreviation is standard throughout Wikipedia's military history articles, but generally, in most articles, the abbreviation is written without the periods/full stops: "US". If you're not sure, you might consult AustralianRupert.

7) I found most of the article quite well written and clear (and I know little about either World War II or air battles). In the third paragraph of the Formosa Air Battle#Aftermath, however, you lost me. I had to read it several times to figure out what this was about. I think it might help to add the adjective "Japanese" before "634th Naval Air Group" so the reader knows which side this is about. Those familiar with the names of battle groups and units will probably know that this was a Japanese air group, but the average Wikipedia reader might not. It might help, also, to give an indication of when the events in the second and third paragraphs happened. I know the third paragraph contains the phrase, "By January 1945", but the second and third paragraphs seem kind of lost in space and time when compared with all the other paragraphs. Adding to that impression are two phrases that mystify me: "Freshly constituted carrier units" and "land-based air power". For the non-expert, these don't mean much. (When I read "freshly constituted", I think of orange juice reconstituted from a frozen state, and I wonder how air power can be land-based.) Well, that's all. – Corinne (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– Corinne (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

8) One more thing: when you want to use the initials of (or some kind of abbreviation for) an organization, agency, unit, etc., you're supposed to give the initials or abbreviation in parentheses after the first mention of the organization, agency, unit, etc. I don't see that for "TG" or "TF". I know that "TG" follows shortly upon the heels of several instances of "Task Group + number", so readers will probably figure it out. AustralianRupert can advise as to whether it is necessary to put "TG" in parentheses after the first mention of "Task Group", and, if so, where to put it; I thought it would look odd placed between "Task Group" and a number, so, if you do add it, I think it would have to be after the number. Also, check to be sure you have done that for all the other acronyms (mostly Japanese command groups). – Corinne (talk) 03:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Formosa Air Battle

The article Formosa Air Battle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Formosa Air Battle for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Hailstone

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Operation Hailstone has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Finktron. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Operation Hailstone

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Hailstone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Operation Hailstone

The article Operation Hailstone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Hailstone for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

#1Lib1Ref
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 27

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

#1Lib1Ref
New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
User Group
Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ike Kepford

Hello Finktron. For years I have planned to do an article on Kepford, and I can take that off my list! Very nice job. Our areas of interest overlap and perhaps we can collaborate. I will send you an email.

Kablammo (talk) 02:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 28

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

#1Bib1Ref
New partners
User Group update
Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
Wikimania
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

Library Card translation
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Finktron. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

OAWiki
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

#1Lib1Ref
New and expanded partners
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil E. Harris has been accepted

Welcome!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert O. Vorse, Jr. has been accepted

Newspapers.com

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

AfC notification: Draft:Patrick D. Fleming has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick D. Fleming has been accepted

Naval Aviation Squadrons

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelius N. Nooy has been accepted

Cecil E. Harris

Your GA nomination of Cecil E. Harris

Your GA nomination of Cecil E. Harris

The DYK hook game

Cecil E. Harris

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Edward Ellis has been accepted

DYK for Cecil E. Harris

You've got mail!

Ira Kepford

Formosa Air Battle

Your GA nomination of Formosa Air Battle

Operation Hailstone

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Your GA nomination of Operation Hailstone

Your GA nomination of Operation Hailstone

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

Books & Bytes - Issue 27

Ike Kepford

Books & Bytes – Issue 28

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

Books & Bytes, Issue 33

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019

Invitation to participate in a discussion about publicly disclosing subscribers of TWL resources

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

Issue 38, January – April 2020

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

Books & Bytes – Issue 41

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

Books & Bytes – Issue 65