User talk:Finance chap

Speedy deletion nomination of Borrowmind

A tag has been placed on Borrowmind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mortgage risk

The article Mortgage risk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:OR essay.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the article's talk page The article is based on a dozne years of experience in analyzing mortgage risk and is factual, useful and unbiased account of an important and practical phenomenon of contemporary life. It would certainly benefit from being exposed to the public to improve and add, where seen fit. Its deletion will be a step away from promoting knownledge, especially on this demonstratably important subject, and only prolong public misinformation due to a lack of subsntial yet concise account of mortgage risk anywhere else on the Internet.

That is not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:NOT. May I suggest publishing the article on a free web host? Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mortgage risk

I have nominated Mortgage risk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mortgage risk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]