Talk:Mortgage underwriting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Factual basis

Finance chap (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC) The article is based on a dozen years of experience in analyzing mortgage risk and is factual, useful and unbiased account of an important and practical phenomenon of contemporary life. It would certainly benefit from being exposed to the public to improve and add, where seen fit, but its deletion will be a step away from promoting knownledge, especially on this demonstratably important subject, and only prolong public misinformation due to a lack of subsntial yet concise account of mortgage risk anywhere else on the Internet.[reply]

As I mention on the other page, please read WP:NOT. You might like to take a look at WP:N as well to learn what is required to prove notability. Saying "This is factual, useful and unbiased, important, practical" etc. is not enough, because then I (or anyone can say) "No it's not" and we're right back where we started. Please read the two guidelines I linked before continuing to introduce new articles. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 04:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]