User talk:Fiddle-fig-mama

Making updates on global topics, localization, botany, and mindfulness topics.

September 2021

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. [1] MrOllie (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, I am trying to change this but the page is blocked. Fiddle-fig-mama (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nimdzi Insights (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Danre98 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately, neither of the sources that were added are sufficient to demonstrate that the subject qualifies for an article. Source 1 is not significant coverage of Nimdzi and I don't think Source 2 is independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nimdzi Insights and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nimdzi Insights, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 17:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fiddle-fig-mama! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 17:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nimdzi Insights

Hello, Fiddle-fig-mama. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nimdzi Insights, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nimdzi Insights

Hello, Fiddle-fig-mama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nimdzi Insights".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello Fiddle-fig-mama. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fiddle-fig-mama. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fiddle-fig-mama|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to MrOllie, thank you and, I understand your concern, but I am not getting paid to edit this page. I am looking to unblock the page from being blacklisted so I can provide relevant sources about the research company. It is already cited multiple times in other Wikipedia articles and by other credible sources. Thank you in advance. Fiddle-fig-mama (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is it cited in other Wikipedia articles? MrOllie (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MrOllie, sure thing

It's cited in articles such as:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9Cbersetzungsdienstleister

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filler_(linguistics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MemoQ

These are just some. I did notice, though, that Nimdzi has been removed as a reference from a number of articles, not only the last two. I also noticed in the history section that MrOllie was removing "unreliable sources." I don't mean to overstep, but I don't believe this is just. There has been a number of times this company has been mentioned across a number of pages and across a number of language. Please reconsider. Thank you in advance. Fiddle-fig-mama (talk) 23:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllieany updates on taking the article out of the gutter? Fiddle-fig-mama (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fiddle-fig-mama. Thank you for creating Nimdzi Insights. User:AirshipJungleman29, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

In the future, try to not use references that do not verify the text, or only serve a purpose of boosting or advertising the article subject.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AirshipJungleman29}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nimdzi Insights

The article Nimdzi Insights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nimdzi Insights

Hello, Fiddle-fig-mama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nimdzi Insights".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]