User talk:FictiousLibrarian

Introduction

Hello, FictiousLibrarian here welcome to my page. I love all things history and science. Excelsior

Welcome!

Hello, FictiousLibrarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Helen(💬📖) 01:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:EnablingActText.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:EnablingActText.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndon B. Johnson

Hi! Thanks for showing interest in making the article on Lyndon B. Johnson a GA; he is a fascinating figure! But, I'm afraid, for nominating it for GA, (1) you need to be either a major contributor, (2) or discuss the possible nomination on the talk page, get consensus, then proceed. Per this, you are not a major contributor, so you'll need to proceed with the second option. As from point of view of a reviewer, I'll say that the article currently is not GA level. A major issue is the length: 106,108 characters are quite honestly a lot. The article can be fully comprehensive even at, say, 70,000 characters. There are few uncited paragraphs, reference formatting inconsistencies, and unreliable sources such as this. It meets the "quick-fail" criteria. I'll suggest to keep working on the article, even I'd like to see it as a GA (even FA!) Let me know if you require any other assistance. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I genuinely appreciate your feedback. It is so frustrating to have a nomination shot down and no one gives any feedback. Though I have a question as to what it means to be a "major contributor"? I am still fairly new at this and the Johnson article has been my first nomination and one I've poured most of my time in. I look forward to working with you in the future, seeing that will be likely as we both have a similar passion for American politics.

Best Regards

FictiousLibrarian (talk). 22:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! To be a major contributor of an article is to either create the article or have authored significant portion of it. Merely copy editing or other 'minor' edits does not constitute for being a major contributor. It is usually measured by 'authorship' percentage of the article. See this. I'll be happy to work with you; let me know if you require any other help. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Eridian314. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kurzgesagt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eridian314 (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research in Anti-Russian sentiment

Hi, I've partially undone your edits to Anti-Russian sentiment to the extent where you've added text not appearing to be supported by the existing sources or the new sources you've added. I've described the specific facts in your edits that I considered unsourced in the edit comments.

I'd also like to remind of you of the Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article. requirement of MOS:LEAD, as well as WP:BURDEN and WP:PAGENUM. PaulT2022 (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Savile

Looking at your edits, I had two alternatives: (1) to revert them as not agreed, despite the lengthy discussions that have taken place on the article talk page; (2) to come here, and strongly recommend you to engage in the talk page discussions, with the aim of coming to a consensus. I chose the second option, but other editors may well simply revert your changes - unless you first argue the case for them on the talk page. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude what are you doing on the Sam Wyly article

I think you reverted some interesting info. And they did have sources...Anyways I'll be reverting back some info... ---Alexysun (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message on my talk page. I agree that it seems to have been edited by him or somebody close to him. I'm not really interested in going back to fix it, so I will leave that to you. My apologies for interfering with your work. Alexysun (talk) 03:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Deadhead

The article Deadhead you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Deadhead for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Constitutionalists in the Mexican Revolution

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Constitutionalists in the Mexican Revolution, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Venustiano Carranza

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Venustiano Carranza, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Greetings, [1] you added and the rising threat of fascism from the West into the article. Please provide a quote from the source saying this. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]