User talk:Fi384Timbrel

This is Fi384Timbrel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosa Smester Marrero (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosa Smester Marrero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rafird! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosa Smester Marrero (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Another editor has noted the statements and assertions that are not cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosa Smester Marrero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simply because the references I included to the page reference section are in Spanish. But that doesn't imply they can't be trusted. Wikipedia is meant to be an exclusive website, right? Literally, translating a webpage into English is not that difficult. Rafird (talk) 04:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosa Smester Marrero has been accepted

Rosa Smester Marrero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 18:41, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rosa Smester Marrero

On 20 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosa Smester Marrero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rosa Smester Marrero said that without women, men would live the life of a turnip? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosa Smester Marrero. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rosa Smester Marrero), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cibao International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Parsley massacre, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I was just trying adding oldest citation added to the story verifiable. Considering this article is consistently made out of non citation just as poets not backed up researchable data. Perhaps I should gather oh my research first then start editing. Fi384Timbrel (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Pbritti (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even with a plethora of information at our disposal research's credibility have been questioned due to its inconsistent quality, adversely affecting the legitimacy on history. For example Lorgia García Peña was used as citation, Harvard rejected Garcia for making up stories. Fi384Timbrel (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]