User talk:Ferro mi

Welcome!

Hello, Ferro mi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Too Tacky for Kev, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gurt Posh (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Too Tacky for Kev

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Too Tacky for Kev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not enough to be "a geuine recording by a genuine band." The first question is whether the band are WP:Notable - see WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved in order to have a Wikipedia article. Even if the band had an article, it does not follow that every recording they made qualifies - an album article would also need to show "significant coverage (of the album) in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - see WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Album articles

Hi. You seem to be creating a lot of articles about albums which contain no more than a track listing. Wikipedia is not intended to contain bare track listings for every album that was ever issued, and these are liable to be deleted or at best redirected to the band article. Please read WP:Notability (music) carefully, especially the section "Albums, singles and songs." WP:Verifiability - citing reliable sources - and WP:Notability, demostrated by references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources are requirements for every Wikipedia article. I know there are a good many bare-track-listing album articles already, but that is not a reason for allowing more. If you are interested in writing about bands and albums, you can probably get advice at WP:WikiProject Albums; but pouring out a stream of track-listing-only articles is likely to be a waste of your time. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rich and Strange – The Anthology

The article Rich and Strange – The Anthology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established per WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Know Ray Harman

The article I Know Ray Harman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

EP that has been long marked for notability and unreferenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Feel No Shame

The article Feel No Shame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, and I found no good sources with a Google search. Certainly not enough for an independent article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]