User talk:Ferreiramy

Welcome!

Hi Ferreiramy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 09:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary L. Johnson has been accepted

Gary L. Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Channing Der (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles require secondary sources that are independent of the subject and contain in-depth coverage of them. Interview-based items and the subjects own work are not independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Channing Der and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Channing Der, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 02:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ferreiramy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 02:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Channing Der

Hello, Ferreiramy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Channing Der, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Klaus Hahn (educator)

Hello, Ferreiramy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Klaus Hahn (educator), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Channing Der has been accepted

Channing Der, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Klaus Hahn (biologist) has been accepted

Klaus Hahn (biologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 22:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Ferreiramy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ferreiramy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ferreiramy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ferreiramy, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ferreiramy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey PRAXIDICAE, I am responding to this message to inform that I do not have a financial stake in promoting this topic. I failed to read the previous message regarding COI. I apologize for the misunderstanding. I look forward to continuing to edit and carry out Wikipedia's mission in accordance with the guidelines. Ferreiramy (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the confusion may have been caused by your statement on your user page that “I work on creating Wikipedia pages for the UNC Department of Pharmacology Faculty.” Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also stop moving Klaus Hahn (biologist) - we do not add multiple disambiguators, and this is disruptive. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. Should I change it to biochemist to keep it as one disambiguator? Ferreiramy (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

keep it the way it is currently, as that is what he is primarily known for. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He was classified as an "American Biochemist" by Greme Bartlett on his page Ferreiramy (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm sorry. I'm not working for the department. I was just making page's about the departments big professors. Ferreiramy (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Henrik Dohlman

Hello, Ferreiramy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henrik Dohlman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Henrik Dohlman

Hello, Ferreiramy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Henrik Dohlman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]