User talk:Felixthehamster

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Felixthehamster. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 15:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Roderick Firth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 13:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iain King

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iain King requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My deletion proposal has been declined. Despite this, the article needs some work. How much of this draft article can be included? Best wishes. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iain King

The article Iain King has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to find any independent, reliable references about him. Without good references per WP:SOURCES, the article cannot remain.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for contributing to the mere addition paradox article. I saw that you created an article and it was nominated for deletion; make sure that the subjects of your articles meet notability criteria and get your sources in place first before you start to write your article. All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable! Thanks. I am also a hamster fan. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthrenocerus blackburni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Hallam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whigs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Do Not Call Register, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Acupalpus stubs

Hi. Please don't mass create a bunch of dead-end stubs for Acupalpus species if you don't have any additional information to put in them. They are of no use to anyone, and just make it harder to systematically create the articles later with more information (such as taxoboxes and references). Please see WP:Stub for the minimal standards for stubs. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 20:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hqp. I have tried to make sure that the stubs are informative, and all now should have a useful taxobox. Felixthehamster (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They also all must have references--you got the information from somewhere, so you should say at the very first edit. They won't be deleted for lacking a reference, but doing them without is not particularly helpful. DGG ( talk ) 22:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Acupalpus carus

O.K. Our friend here need to see what a stub article should look like, otherwise I am afraid he might not get it. Like, some people are visual, others may be not. So, here we go:

Dear Felixthehamster, I have fixed your Acupalpus carus article and provided a reference.

Thank you, Mishae, Felix Felixthehamster (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

It is very crucial for Wikipedia to have all of the articles verifiable otherwise some might get deleted. The species, in my opinion, is the best start in Wikipedia. Here, the articles don't get deleted, however to avoid copyvio, every article must be referenced so to be on the safe side and so that no one will get in trouble (weather legal or not). Feel free to ask me for any help, as I do beetle articles myself and can assist with any advice if needed.

P.S. Just like you I am a huge hamster fan myself! --Mishae (talk) 03:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Felixthehamster (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, have you met my friend @SuperHamster:? By the way, speaking of hamsters would you like to join WikiProject Rodents? There you will find plenty of rodents (especially hamsters), which are super cute!-Mishae (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - yes, I am very keen to join this 'Super Group' of Rodent people!Felixthehamster (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Insulin-like_growth_factor_2

Hi, you knidly changed hormones to hormones , but this is totally unnecessary as the link works economically as it stood.

thanks WeigelaPen (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, WeigelaPen Felixthehamster (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 78 Cancri

The article 78 Cancri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable astronomical object. Fails all criteria to be notable as per notability of astronomical objects.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Note: Delayed procedural notice. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]