Jump to content

User talk:WeigelaPen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi I am opeing this discussion page. Hello, My name is WeigelaPen (talk) 13:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the Mexican fairy is due back in October AlbaMilou (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]
Hello, WeigelaPen! We just wanted to thank you, again, for attending the Wikipedia training workshop today. We do hope you found the experience worthwhile and will continue to contribute to Wikipedia.

The training pages can be found here, should you wish to review them.

You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rockpocket 21:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

RE

[edit]

I only gave links provided by a database. If you think that something in the database was wrong, please contact authors of the database through email they provided and discuss it with them. Happy editing, My very best wishes (talk) 13:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you change links, please check that links are not broken as a result of your changes. Thank you for improving these articles, My very best wishes (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Y Y Y, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsaturated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MED1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CcdA/CcdB Type II Toxin-antitoxin system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transcription and Complex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

MED26 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Transcription, Residue, Conserved and Rate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TA System edits

[edit]

Hi Penny, there is some discussion regarding your edits to the Talk:Toxin-antitoxin_system that you might want to get involved in. --Paul (talk) 00:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PilZ domain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fimbria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes to the histones page

[edit]

Hi! You undid my changes on the histone page. Could you explain me what's wrong with it? What's being displayed should be referred to as nucleosome since it shows all histones wrapped around a piece of DNA. And the caption is just completely wrong because 1) it does not display only one histone, and 2) it definitely does not display H2AFJ (they're not even human histones). --Carandraug (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The pfam database is for families of proteins but the image is representative of a complex they form, not of the family. It's not even representative of a single element of the family, it shows 8 of them. The name of the thing being represented is "Core nucleosome", not "core histone ...". Even if the last one was correct, it should be histones (plural). The histone is not the complex, there's 8 histones on the figure (2 histones H2A, 2 histones H2B, 2 histones H3, and 2 histones H4). And the caption you wrote now is overly complex. It says "Complex between nucleosome core particle (h3,h4,h2a,h2b) and 146 bp long DNA fragment" but this is incorrect. The nucleosome core particle is the histone complex with the DNA wrapped around it. From the paper that published this structure (doi:10.1038/38444):

Two copies of each histone protein, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, are assembled into an octamer that has 145-147 base pairs (bp) of DNA wrapped around it to form a nucleosome core (of relative molecular mass 206K). [...] The nucleosome (nucleosome core, linker DNA and H1)

--Carandraug (talk) 15:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I don't understand this edit at all. It doesn't look like the wikilink was within a url. StAnselm (talk) 21:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

[edit]

'url' was a form of abbreviation - I'm sorry. This wikilink was inside a pair of ref tags, so you were giving a link to the journal when the reference was listed under 'References' - I don't think this is appropriate

thanks WeigelaPen (talk) 08:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, WP:OVERLINK specifically mentioned that wikilinks can (and sometimes should) be used in footnotes. StAnselm (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, thanks for adding links to Enterotoxin type B. However, you can just write the link normally as [[Eenterotoxin type B]] rather than [[Enterotoxin type B|enterotoxin type B]]. I've fixed the heading in your reply so it works correctly; the standard way of replying to people on talk pages is to indent your comments. Graham87 14:59, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for fixing my 'it it' mistake. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 14:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bacteriophage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dishevelled

[edit]

Hello WeigelaPen, why do you think the Wiktionary link at Dishevelled is inappropriate? If someone comes to Wikipedia looking for information about the word "dishevelled" they are going to be mighty confused by the article on the protein. So we should give them a link to Wiktionary so they can find out about the word itself. What is the matter with that? The fact that the word has nothing really to do with the protein is, to me, irrelevant. — This, that and the other (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think users coming to Wikipedia and searching for "dishevelled" will not want a dictionary definition of the word? I am almost certain most of them will be looking for such information. By comparison, the protein is a relatively obscure topic, so we are doing our readers a great disservice by not including a prominent link to a definition of the word.
You will find that many existing Wikipedia articles contain links to Wiktionary, for example, calm. In dishevelled it is especially importnat to include the link at the top of the article, as users will not be interested in scrolling through what they perceive as irrelevant material to find a link to a definition of the word — This, that and the other (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I did that. Thanks for your suggestion. — This, that and the other (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing names from Articles for creation/Participants

[edit]

Why are you removing people that have been on wiki for years and have thousands of edits? You have 500 undeleted edits. The bare minimum. Please do not remove participants that quality the requirements. Check the user count before removing names.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  14:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at SmileBlueJay97's talk page.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collagenase, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cleavage, Residue and Signal sequence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pacifastin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Residue and Antiparallel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ribosomal protein SA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, WeigelaPen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, WeigelaPen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WeigelaPen&oldid=1142695128"