User talk:Felipe Menegaz/Archive 15
|
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Felipe Menegaz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - ... (up to 100) |
Orphaned non-free image If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 06:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC) VIC Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpgHello Felipe, Could you please add geocoded data in order to fulfill the request posted on Commons:Valued image candidates/Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpg. I think you could locate the precise place, see the clue on the review page. Thanks and regards, --Myrabella (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Venues of the 2016 Summer OlympicsHi! I understand why you moved those pages, but still it is better to discuss those moves first. However, I am not sure if those moves are really needed. If you check the page names of the venues of the 1960, the 1968, and the 1992 Olympic Games, you will see that most venues are in their native names. That's why it is better to discuss the moves first, as they are controversial. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Olá!Eu entendo porque você moveu estas páginas, mas ainda assim é melhor discutir antes estas mudanças de nome. Entretanto, eu não estou certo de que estas mudanças de nome são realmente necessárias. Se você checar os nomes das páginas nos Jogos Olímpicos de 1960, 1968, e 1992, você verá que a maior parte dos estádios estão em seus nomes nativos. Por isso eu acho melhor discutir primeiro estas mudanças de nome, já que são controversas. Abraços, --Carioca (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC) DYK for Venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics
Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free imageIf you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Brazil – United States relationsHello Felipe! I wanted your opinion on the article Brazil – United States relations. User:Myk60640 keeps adding the following controversial material to the article: The issue of the abduction of children from the US to Brazil has been raised by US President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the US House of Representatives and other US officials and major media. As of December 2009, there are 66 American children that have been taken by one of their parents to live in Brazil. While Brazil should have returned every child to the US, under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, it has not. Under the treaty, one parent cannot flee the legal jurisdiction where the child resides -- "his habitual residence" -- to shop for a more favorable court venue in another country to contest for custody..[10][11][12]. This is in reference to the Sean Goldman case. The statement is one-sided, as it does not take in consideration the position of the Brazilian family. It gives a distorted image of Brazil that does not comply with NPOV. Furthermore, the case is still being handled by the Brazilian Judicial system, and there has not been a final decision on this case. And most importantly, I don't think a civil custody case is worthy of mention in this article (about inter-state relations) per se. Please let me know your opinion on the article's talk page Talk:Brazil – United States relations (under RfC). Thank you. Limongi (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Unreferenced BLPs
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Service awards proposal
Images nominated at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 January 24An number of image or media files that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion page to see why this is if you are interested in it not being deleted. These files are: File:Olympic Whitewater Stadium.jpg, File:Olympic Training Center - Hall 4.jpg, File:Olympic Training Center - Hall 3.jpg, File:Olympic Training Center - Hall 2.jpg, File:Olympic Training Center - Hall 1.jpg, File:Olympic Tennis Center.jpg, File:Olympic BMX Center.jpg and File:Olympic Aquatics Stadium.jpg. Thank you, Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC) Orphaned non-free imagePLEASE NOTE:
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC) Olympic bid FT inviteThanks for the offer. I do not have any time. After college basketball season ends, I have to get back to Millennium Park, which needs to promote two more articles for retain FT on September 1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Re: Venues of the 2016 Summer OlympicsSorry about getting back to you. Looking at the template, it seems some of the venues are already existing non sports facilities, such at the Fort Copacabana and Marina da Glória. I could articles on a couple of the venues, but I won't be able to do all of them. Venues like Marina da Glória would likely be more notable as a marina now, not as a 2016 competition venue. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 23:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC) Non-free files in your user space
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Mapas do BrasilOlá Felipe, tudo bem? Sobre os mapas utilizados nas ilustrações pib, taxas de analfabetismo e mortalidades por estado Brasil, a tendência é mesmo substituir por uma cor apenas e utilizar o degrade? Isso sem dúvida minimiza o problema para pessoas daltônicas, mas fico com a impressão que isso possa dificultar um pouco o reconhecimento imediato do valor de cada estado (de modo geral não tenho problema com isso, mas só gostaria de discutir, já que você tem um contato maior com o projeto da en.wp). Particularmente, a legenda do File:Brazilian States by GDP per capita.svg está correta no artigo? (eu consigo ver bem a diferença entre SP e SC no mapa, mas não nas legendas +15 mil e +20 mil - talvez porque a área do quadrado da legenda seja pequeno...). Lembro que há alguns anos, você adicionou ao mapa o contorno da Lagoa dos Patos ao RS. Depois disso, você fez mais alguma mudança? Pegunto pois eu geralmente edito manualmente esses mapas, usando classes/folhas de estilo internas para evitar aqueles comentários e marcações que o inkscape e corel draw colocam sem necessidade (e que aumentam significativamente o tamanho do arquivo). Outra coisa, eu vejo com bons olhos criar uma imagem para cada ano, ao invés de sobreescrever o mesmo arquivo a cada ano (algo semelhante já é feito em List of countries by Human Development Index): isso evita problemas de desatualizações de informação nas várias wikis que usam a mesma imagem (às vezes é necessário alterar a legenda, mas nem sempre o texto nos artigos de outros idiomas), e eventualmente, facilita a comparação entre as mudanças dos indicadores a cada ano. Abraços. Giro720 (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Rio de Janeiro temporary logo for the 2016 Summer ParalympicsI can not find the image you uploaded in the source which is provided. If they haven't created a logo with the Paralympic symbol, I believe it would be misinformative to add one to the article. They should have one, hopefully they do, but it's not added to the source for the image. Bib (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: 2010 Tokyo BidI will continue to watch the article for Tokyo's 2016 Bid, but I don't think I would be of much help in terms of article building up to FA; GA would probably be as far as I go, and even then I have no experience taking this type of article up to GA. That said, the article as it stands looks pretty well so far, but I don't know what other info is necessary to bring it up even to GA, let alone FA, though consulting Chicago's or Rio's bid would be a good start. Might I recommend you drop a line at WT:JP where other interested editors may want to contribute, at least for the Tokyo bid.--十八 22:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC) Reviewer granted Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
|
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
