User talk:FelipeCaraVieja

Welcome!

Hello, FelipeCaraVieja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Adam mars, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Theopolisme (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam mars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adam mars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Theopolisme (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Michelle Williams (singer), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FelipeCaraVieja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been used for my cousin who is really a huge joker, I'd like to create a new one from this IP, and I promise I'll be careful enough to avoid this fatality to happen again. I apologize. FelipeCaraVieja FelipeCaraVieja (talk) 03:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not totally sure about this, given that the first edit from this account, within seven minutes of its creation, is still a little dubious. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FelipeCaraVieja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize to everyone, I know I made a mistake, but it's just I didn't agree with the "soprano" qualification that was given to Michelle Williams, but that's OK, I guess it's been taken from reliable sources, so I will not edit this or any other page without before having confirmed the veracity of its contents. So, please, the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I've been blocked for, I'll not do it again, and I'll make productive contributions instead. FelipeCaraVieja (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First you say it was your cousin who did it (which would require us to lock this account as WP:GOTHACKED), now you're claiming it's you. I think we need to start with some radical honesty here - Wikipedia is not a game or a toy (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.