User talk:FeerTheDeer

FeerTheDeer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi FeerTheDeer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Kyle McMahon was accepted

Kyle McMahon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 01:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle McMahon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle McMahon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle McMahon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD of Owen Marks

You tagged Owen Marks for AfD, but you did not create the AfD page. Please create this, including the rationalle you used on talk:Owen Marks, or remove the AfD tag from the article. Thanks! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, FeerTheDeer! Thank you for your contributions. I am 78.26 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 02:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kyle McMahon

Hi, FeerTheDeer! Thanks for the note, and I appreciate your efforts with the Kyle McMahon article. Certainly I have no bias against this person or anyone who helped with the article's creation. As is true with most editors at AfD, I am merely making an evaluation based on the information available. Reasonable people can (and often) disagree, especially during AfD discussions, so staying civil is paramount. I'm glad you didn't take my observations personally, and I wish you luck your future contributions on Wikipedia! Cheers, Gong show 16:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alerting the authors

As an experienced Wikipedian (and an admin locally), I would like to encourage you to continue to notify the author(s) of an article if proposed for deletion in the future! It is important that author(s) know about such discussions so that they can bring up any points that might otherwise be ignored/not noticed at the AfD. The only caveat is that you should say that you have done so before they show up, so that we know that the new users commenting are the authors.

Unfortunately, some new users think that numbers have more of an influence on the discussion than they really do, so they violate our rules on sockpuppeting to try to artificially try to make it look like they have more support than they do. This approach virtually never works, but people still try it. Letting us know ahead of time that you've asked for the creators' input helps minimize the suspicion of this behavior so that the discussion can remain focused on its merits.

Thanks for your contributions and happy editing! – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 20:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Philosopher for your note. Glad to know that tellng you guys what I was doing helped. I got a little nervous that I screwed up :) FeerTheDeer (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 08:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]