User talk:Fatima 77

File copyright problem with File:Burton Goldfield.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Burton Goldfield.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Diannaa (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the copyright holder wishes to release the image to Wikipedia under license, please follow the instructions at WP:consent. The image needs a license tag regardless, and will be deleted in a few days unless one is added. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How to edit the title of the page

I am trying to edit the title of the page. It recommends adding {{DISPLAY TITLE:}} in the edit and it will change, but it isn't working. Please help. Fatima 77 (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Fatima[reply]

Hey Fatima, if you want to edit the title of a page, you hover over the "More" tab and then click "Move." Please make sure you read Wikipedia:Article titles before changing the names of pages, because there are sometimes complicated rules about pages having the correct names. Also if you want to ask for more Help and advice the Administrators Noticeboard is the wrong place. Try the Teahouse or the help desk. Bosstopher (talk) 09:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your question at WT:Administrators' noticeboard because that's not the right place. If the above explanation is not enough, please ask at WP:HELPDESK. Does this concern Draft:Burton M Goldfield? If so, please include a link and a brief description of what result you want. {{DISPLAYTITLE}} is used to change the appearance of a title (for example, by displaying it in italics). Johnuniq (talk) 10:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Burton M Goldfield is waiting for review at (the review box is at the foot of the page for some reason) which will happen in a week or so. Personally I don't think you've shown notability, but maybe you'll get a more sympathetic reviewer. Bazj (talk) 10:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Burton Goldfield image.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Burton Goldfield image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fatima 77. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Fatima 77. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burton M Goldfield (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burton M Goldfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fatima 77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burton M Goldfield (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burton M Goldfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fatima 77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burton M Goldfield (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rhumidian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burton M Goldfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rhumidian (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fatima 77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rhumidian (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist information

I reverted your edits on The Zeitgeist Movement because they were not neutral and seamed promotional. Also your major sourcing was from a John Birch Society article from The New American. That is fringe at best and probably not a good citation. Earl King Jr. (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Zeitgeist Movement.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.