User talk:Farmdudler

Welcome!

Hello, 黄雨伞, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Edcolins (talk) 20:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Head Full Of Dreams (Promotional?) Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Head Full Of Dreams (Promotional?) Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Trump inauguration and CNN's gigapixel photo

Hey there. I've been concerned about that gigapixel photo myself, and looked around the Internet for sources. I found this zoomed-out photo of Trump's inauguration, and fortunately it wasn't cloudy on Obama's inauguration in 2009, so I found this shot of that. (Identifying which building was which took a while, but see that small, round, green one on the right of Obama's inauguration?)

Looking at how the area is laid out, the those white buildings end a fair distance away from the Washington Monument. And in the gigapixel photo, the crowd ends before those white buildings. --Kiz o r 15:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are indeed right! Thank you for correcting this. 黄雨伞 (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. --Kiz o r 15:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dennis-barden.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dennis-barden.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dennis-barden.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dennis-barden.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm David Eppstein. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dennis Barden, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —David Eppstein (talk) 22:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Agenda 2063

Hello, 黄雨伞,

Thank you for creating Agenda 2063.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Some categories for the page would be nice.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Tschugguel

I am aware of the Austrian laws, which was why it is included in a footnote after the part of the lede that states "in Austria he is known as Alexander Tschugguel", because in two of the sources from German articles he is referred to by his baronial title, which is allowed outside of Austria as courtesy. You will notice that the article for the man who you referenced as an example also does this (Karl von Habsburg). -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I get your point! Sorry :-) --黄雨伞 (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

missing file

Up until a few days ago a file you uploaded to commons was used as a reference in the article List of countries by length of coastline, although the file was deleted in 2015 (log). I am wondering if you still have this file or know of another place it can be found. --Lasunncty (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I no longer have it, sorry! 黄雨伞 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xiaomi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Venkat TL (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Venkat TL! I understand if XDA Developers does not count as a reliable source. Could you have a look at that article though? I think you will agree that the statement by the Lithuanian Ministery, as well as the section in Xiaomi as it is right now are quite misleading about what really happened (unless the author on XDA is a weird liar and fabricated their screenshots etc.…). However, I was not able to find any articles containing that same clarification on any major news website. It seems like they are interested in a story like "Lithuanian government suggests to throw away Xiaomi phones" much more than in the follow-up "Actually Xiaomi was just filtering ads on its own ad platform". Of course we cannot change the article without a reliable source, but we also shouldn't keep it as it is, which would give the reader a false impression. Maybe it is best to remove that paragraph altogether? 黄雨伞 (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The response is more like a PR response to the expose. Wikipedia cannot publish it if the reliable sources find it unimpressive. Also, I do not believe XDA is independent. You can propose your edits on the article talk page and see what others think. At best it can go as a clarification of the claims. It would still need reliable source though. Venkat TL (talk) 06:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the suggestion, I will write something on the talk page there! 黄雨伞 (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trump and NOTFORUM

Hello! Talk:Donald Trump is for discussing improvements to the Donald Trump article, not for more general forum-like discussions about Trump, politics, and such. I hope you will keep this in mind in any future participation there. See WP:NOTFORUM for the relevant Wikipedia policy. ―Mandruss ☎ 02:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I feel that it was a relevant point for the question of whether or not the views of people with low education should be represented in the article. Farmdudler (talk) 07:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]