User talk:Farm Shepherds

This is Farm Shepherds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutherford English Shepherd (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://docplayer.net/183815694-The-book-of-ole-shep.html, https://esfacts.org/escr/breedstandard.php. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Farm Shepherds/sandbox/Rutherford English Shepherd may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Farm Shepherds! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you just one person?

I'm asking because your username implies you may either be more than one person, or you may have created this account to "represent" an organization. I hope I'm wrong. If I'm wrong, just say so and I will apologize.

Please read Wikipedia:Username policy. If I'm right, please either change your username or abandon this one and create another. Changing your username is better if only one person has ever used this account. If more than one person has ever used it, it's better to abandon this one entirely and have each person create their own account using a name that complies with the policy.

If you do replace this account with one or more other accounts, please post a link on the user page to the new account or accounts, then contact an admin and ask them to block this account from editing, just so there won't be any misunderstandings later.

Again, I hope I'm wrong, I hope you are one individual and that you are not representing or editing on behalf of any organization, company, group, or anyone else other than yourself. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Disregard, I see now that the "shepherds" refers to dogs. I apologize for jumping to conclusions. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutherford English Shepherd (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutherford English Shepherd (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all the references lead back to a prolific single breeder. Thus they are not independent

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 10:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd

Hello, Farm Shepherds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rutherford English Shepherd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]