User talk:Farazjarwar12

Welcome!

Hello, Farazjarwar12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jarwar did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 14:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello faraz Jarwar

Bhai please meri information please na delete karrein meny apki information bilkul bhi delete nahi karri. Aryan Jarwar (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yar ap galat information q put kr rhe hain Farazjarwar12 (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jarwar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Farazjarwar12! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 16:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinoz the information you reverted is unofficial and not authentic please remove if need documentation i will give u Farazjarwar12 (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Jarwar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit

this recent change is reverted, and will be discussed on the talk page.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 16:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss Farazjarwar12 (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]