User talk:Fannyflash

Speedy deletion nomination of Vajazzle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vajazzle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby Murray 17:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why does it matter? Do you want to put people off using & editing pages?Fannyflash (talk) 20:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We don't want to put people off, it's just that we have extremely stringent guidelines as to what is an appropriate encyclopedia article, and what isn't - it's a challenge many people have ES &L 22:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add: the word "vajazzle" is a neologism - it has no place on an encyclopedia. The community discussed it MORE THAN ONCE and agree that it's an inappropriate topic (although maybe wiktionary might accept it in theor neologism section). It has now been deleted 5 times, so please stop ES &L 22:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Ruby Murray, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for personal attacks, creating and recreating inappropriate articles, and some vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 02:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]