User talk:Fanatical Submarine

Talk Page Rules

Hello. Welcome to my talk page. Here, every one of my requests, appeals, or anything else goes here! Do not attack other users on this page and PLEASE do not vandalize. Welcome!

Hello, Fanatical Submarine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Whale Protection Status, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Singularity42 (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Whale Protection Status

The article Whale Protection Status has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to verify the existence of this term.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Whale Protection Status for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whale Protection Status is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whale Protection Status until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Singularity42 (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Windows First Class Protecter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 21:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St. Gabriel the Archangel CES/ Woodbridge.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — The Earwig ^(talk) 20:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Hi Fanatical Submarine, I have unblocked your account. Please understand that this doesn't mean you can continue to edit in the way you did. If others are warning you you are doing things wrong, take it to heart, and stop doing what you are warned for. If you don't quite understand what they mean, ask them instead of ignoring it. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Big Blocking Question

I just saw an account blocked for being associated with a business. I don't know why that doesn't work on Wikipedia!? Oh well, it would be nice if you could answer my question. Fanatical Submarine (talk) 17:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Neutral point of view. Basically, it's difficult to write neutrally about a subject to which one is closely related. Tiderolls 18:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Starting to Review..

Hey. I'm eager to start reviewing AFC submissions, and I want to start here. Could you tell me how to safely, and properly review an AFC submission? Fanatical Submarine (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good read of the reviewing instructions;
Install the script mentioned therein;
Add the reviewers talk page and this help desk page to your watchlist;
You need to make sure you have a good understanding of policies and guidelines. Pol430 talk to me 22:09, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does make sense

Have a look at WP:USERNAME. The block was for two reasons - one was a name that appeared to represent an organisation (Wikipedia accounts are for individuals and not for groups), and the other was advertising. See WP:SPAM. That's what I do when the two things come together. There's a softer block for having the wrong name but editing reasonably well - that just usually requires a change of name (or even just a new account not mentioning the company or underwater knitting circle or whatever it was). If there's spam from a username that passes USERNAME, they get a caution from me if it looks deliberate. There's two more levels, and after Level 4 there's usually a Spam Only block. Most of these are just trying it on, and give up after the first attempt to plug their corner florists and martial arts gym or whatever. The bag sellers and fake Rolex pushers are professional spammers and get no mercy. OK? Any more questions, you can ask on my talk page. If I'm not around, there's quite a lot who stalk it and ~~usually~~ sometimes give better answers than I do. Peridon (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The one you're referring to was a glorious bit of PR talk, and had address and telephone number too... Pure advertising. Peridon (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review followup

Do I HAVE to install the script? There must be some other way!--Fanatical Submarine (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A'a Lava.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ryan Vesey Review me! 21:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing

Hello again. Unfortunately, I am not able to install the script needed for reviewing AFC submissions. However, I still want to review, as my reckless point of view on the submissions has changed over time. Please, inform if there is anything I can do to pursue my interest in reviewing AFC submissions without installing the script. I heard there was manual mode...... Fanatical Submarine (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tanked (Mobile App).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A'a Lava concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A'a Lava, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission A'a Lava

Hello Fanatical Submarine. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled A'a Lava.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A'a Lava}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 02:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]