Thanks for uploading Image:Conservative logo 2006.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot21:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you post a vandalism warning on my talk page?
There is no way that any rational person could construe my edit as vandalism. I removed a repeating string of “THIS IS A GAY TURD” which was inserted by the user Asdfgh, who has since been indefinitely blocked. Your reversion of my edit not only undid a legitimate subsequent edit made by another user, but also reinserted the repeating string of “THIS IS A GAY TURD”. I should also point out that your recent edit to Black History Month appears to be vandalism, which is also a page that has been vandalized by Asdfgh recently. This makes me wonder if you are working in cahoots with Asdfgh, or if he has hijacked your account. RSRScrooge(Talk)21:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, as you have done are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner as you did you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. uriel8 (talk)09:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not worried about whether it's about Iranians or Americans. While I understand that the movie is silly, the "YEAH" thing is not appropriate for the WP article. In any case, I undid your "YEAH" edit but redid your reasonable section title edit. Cheers. The Behnam19:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ViridaeTalk22:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
){kind=link}
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to 300 (film). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TomTheHand 18:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 300 (film), you will be blocked from editing. The Behnam 19:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 300 (film), you will be blocked from editing. The Behnam 19:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
