User talk:FakTNeviM/Archive 03

Your recent edits to User talk:Jeffro77

While you have asserted your right to vanish, you have not vanished and are still continuing to harass User:Jeffro77. STOP POSTING ON HIS TALK PAGE. I am resurrecting the WP:ANI report. -danjel (talk to me) 04:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

As you wish. My leaving was fullfilled. But it doesn´t mean I will stop contributions. E.g. "welcoming", "recent changes" and whatever else I would like to will be continue. I only leaved from activity in the projects. Previously I planned fully stop here. But now, maybe yes, maybe not. Surely I will, and actually I do, limit my contribs to minimum which I am able to due my other hobbies and health. Wiki is just not first, but rather last for me. Maybe pre-last. Some kind of addiction probably. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 04:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:FaktneviM, used WP:RTV to avoid consequences, continues to harass. Thank you. -danjel (talk to me) 04:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

***STOP*** Posting on Jeffro77's talkpage

Do you not understand the seriousness of the discussion at ANI? Do you think that we're all playing a game? How many times does the entirety of the wikipedia community have to tell you to back off? STOP HARASSING JEFFRO77. -danjel (talk to me) 11:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

THAT IS NOT HARASSING JEFFRO77. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I several times clearly reveal my attitude. No matter no listen on that. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 11:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

What's going on?

Hi FaktneviM. I'm looking through the recent history, and I'd like some answers to some simple questions from you. This will help clarify things for me, and probably other editors who are confused. To be clear I'm not interested in your perceptions of the content of the encyclopedia, nor in anything to do with religion.

1. Do you intend to carry on editing the encyclopedia?
2. Do you understand that repeated unwanted attention to a user constitutes harassment and is not acceptable on the encyclopedia?
3. As such, will you disengage from Jeffro77?

I'm happy to discuss individual situations, and try and work out a way to help you - but I'd like those questions answered as a priority. Worm^TT · (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Your questions are kind, so I try to be polite despite I am highly irritated from those .PÍP. on ANI.

1) I think yes, but after freeing from wiki-addiction. Until that I am not able of it neither stop nor continue more seriously.

2) I understood, but they do not at all.

3) I do not agree with term disengage. If my communication with him will be disruptive (again, ...he responds....nice)...so that is evidence, he wants to discuss. If not, he surely said so.

4) I think discussion with people like you is possible, but with those .PÍP. on ANI is no hope for they´ll finally understand my attitude. (which is quite difficult, incomprehensible, etc ... as I am).

Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 12:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Generally, one of the most accepted ways of freeing yourself from addiction is though cold turkey. In other word, complete removal of the addictive focus. I think the idea of Wikibreak enforcer is a good one. Perhaps you should try that out, set it for 1 month. If after 1 month you want to carry on with the break, set it for 6 or 12 months. If you need to remove it, you can always email me or another friendly admin to remove it for you.

From what I've seen, you are contacting Jeffro77 against his wishes. This is called unwanted attention. I understand that you do not see the conversation as disruptive, but the very fact that you are contacting him against his wishes is disruptive. If Jeffro77 were to confirm my belief, would you accept that you should not contact him, except for notifications required by wikipedia policy?

As I said, I'm happy to try to discuss the matter with you - but we do need to diffuse the current situation first. Worm^TT · (talk) 12:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I almost did that js page. But meanwhile something other happen. I´d like to contact you in future in need. Our questions were almost resolved. However, I haven´t a chance to react on that. Anyway, thanks for help. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for harrassing other users and general disruptive editing. See [1] and [2]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Seems to me I am not blocked properly. Several times I logged in successfully. Anyway I don´t want take an advantage (rather disadvantage) from that.

Worse problem is I can´t edit my "monobook.js", so I am not able to fix that error and direct myself enforced wikibreak which will work. (on Czech Wikipedia I tested that script and it´s really working. Without errors. And that is great.

--Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi FaktnveiM. Just to let you know, you are blocked from editing, not from logging in. There's also no block that administrators do which stops you from reading the encyclopedia. You are allowed to edit your talk page for the purposes of appealing the block as the template suggests. Worm^TT · (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Be logged in is not needed for reading at all. And I am not interested about reading it anyway. I also deleted all from my watchlist.

OK. I see now I can´t edit other pages. "Normal block" as I have now allow me all, excluding one - editing. Difference from that script is: JS just allow me "log in" and immediately "log me out" ... like deliberately jerks and that seems to me more comfortable with intended purpose I wish.

I tested few days in CZ wiki that JS and after expiration I just extended it. I like that freedom so far.

Thanks for well-mind guiding me, indeed. Where could I find e-mail in case of oncoming need? (I found the link at the bottom of your User Page, 07:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC))

Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Testing if other functions work, or not. Yeah! :)) Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 07:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page User_talk:FaktneviM worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop! :)) Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
Your continued joking at User_talk:FaktneviM is disruptive and considered vandalism. You may be blocked from editing Wikipedia the next time you do so. Please stop using improper humor. :)) Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 07:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I am not scary of being blocked. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)