User talk:Faiyzaan

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faiyzaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

will never do mistake again in futureFaiyzaan (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After the gross personal attacks you made on another editor, we'd need to hear a lot more by way of explanation and understanding than that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faiyzaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it was just by a mistake i will never do this mistake again

Decline reason:

"Just by a mistake" you did three times in a row, not counting the equally inappropriate edit summaries? I fail to see how one could write something like that by mistake. Huon (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faiyzaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am block by DMacks without any reason and my last edit was just a correction in peshawar district because pashto is largest spoken in peshawar about 91% of people are pashtuns nothing is vandalism in this

Decline reason:

Allow me to retort. You were given numerous warnings before your block. Specifically, you've made numerous unsourced changes,questionable deletions, and other disruptive edits that will need to be addressed before an unblock is considered. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment WP:DENY may apply here. While possibly moot at this point, as the unblock request has been declined, there are several indicators that this account was being utilized for the purposes of block evasion and continued disruption. I would also decline on the basis of inflammatory and graphically offensive edit summaries and personal attacks toward other editors which may have gone unnoticed as these remarks were not in the English language.

Examples include: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

This is a clear case of not being here to constructively and collaboratively build an encyclopedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, I recognize at least one of those words. Talk page access revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]